“highly significant”

YPP expressed positive highly significant correlation with HSW (r = 0.85, p < 0.001), while it showed negligible negative correlation with DF and PM.

Broad sense heritability estimated was 0.53, with highly significant genotypic variance ( P value ≤ 0.001).

ANOVA showed highly significant effects ( P < 0.001) of genotypes, environments, and genotype × environment interactions for GY in the seven EYTs ( Supplementary Table 2 ).

Results Initial metabolite concentrations At day 0, there were highly significant differences in the concentrations of metabolites present (F 4,1074 = 262.87, P < 0.001) for all life cycle stages (F 2,1074 = 791.7, P < 0.001) with a significant interaction between metabolite and life cycle stage (F 8,1074 = 227.9, P < 0.001; Fig. 1 ).

Comparisons between the homozygous sister lines, raised in a growth chamber, revealed a highly significant decrease (37%, P< 0.001) in SNS in the combined lfy mutant relative to the WT ( Fig. 1B,C , Table S2 ).

However, the high dose of clozapine evinced a large, highly significant increase in norepinephrine levels compared to both the controls and the low dose of clozapine at all time points after treatment ( p < 0.001).

The highly significant overrepresentation ( p < 0.001, Pearson’s Chi-square test) of STAT1 transcription factors among the putative promoters of the differentially expressed genes suggested an important role for STAT factors during the PEDV infection process.

Positivity of plasma EBV-DNA at diagnosis was a highly significant prognosticator of OS (HR, 8.38; 95% CI, 3.03-23.19; P <0.001).

There were also highly significant differences between populations for RL (P > .001) and NLSR (P > .0001) and for CL (P > .0001) but in this case differences between populations depended on the hour at which the measurements were taken.

When the empathy quotient is zero, the impostor syndrome is estimated at 73.711 with a standard error of 0.821 and is highly significant ( p < 0.001).

Antioxidant status The Cr (VI)‐driven oxidative stress in renal tissue was manifested by a highly significant reduction ( p < .001) GSH content (59.16 ± 5.89 nmol/mg) in the kidney for Cr (VI)‐treated rabbits as compared to that of the control group (111.1 ± 3.63 nmol/mg).

In our study, the differences in number of patients who could complete the 6MWT was statistically highly significant for both procedures ( P <.001).

AMs of both age groups showed high preferential uptake for (-)NPs; however, the aged AM group demonstrated a highly significant ( p < 0.001) decrease in uptake of (-)NPs ( Fig. 4 B ) .

The results showed that the chronic effect of BPA yielded highly significant differences ( p < 0.001) between treatments in the three measured parameters ( Table 2 ) .

The fall armyworm damage incidence in the untreated was very highly significant (LR χ 2 = 17.17; df = 1; P < 0.001—LR χ 2 = 7.68; df = 1; P = 0.005), significant (LR χ 2 = 6.53; df = 1; P = 0.011—LR χ 2 = 4.04; df = 1; P = 0.044), or similar (LR χ 2 = 2.42; df = 1; P = 0.119—LR χ 2 = 0.277; df = 1; P = 0.599) to treated plots in 50.00%, 12.50%, or 37.50% of the cases, respectively when the data where considered per sites and the sampling dates.

We found highly significant differences ( p <0.001) among several categories of nonconveyed cases and on-scene time intervals among EMS centers.

The age effect, indicating an age-related decrease in performance, was highly significant ( p < 0.001) in all disciplines and for both sexes.

Only the percentage of CD57 + NK cells showed a highly significant correlation (r = 0.909, p< 0.001, Spearman test) ( Figure 3D ), with a slope value in linear regression analysis close to one (p = 0.3587, F-test).

For response time, a three-way ANOVA for age groups (childhood, young-adulthood, mid-adulthood and older adulthood), language groups (monolinguals, multilinguals) and congruency (congruent, incongruent) revealed a highly significant main effect of congruency overall, F (1,322) = 464.7, p < .001, η p 2 = .59, The interaction between congruency and age group on response time was significant, F (3,322) = 9.0, p < .001, η p 2 = .08, but not for language groups, F (1,322) = .58, p = .45, η p 2 = .002.

However, some of them show highly significant ( P < 0.001) correlation.

The improvements in executive at each of the 4 weeks compared to that at baseline were highly significant ( P < 0.001) in the anodal group but not in the sham group ( Table 3 ).

However, there was also a highly significant overall temporal progression in ARG composition, both when looking at the data set as a whole (R 2 = 0.05, p < 0.001, Fig. 1 d), and when looking at each of the twelve infants individually (p < 0.01 for all tests).

However, the overall log-rank test was highly significant ( P < .001) among all groups. 18 To our knowledge, the association between PD-L1 expression and hyperprogression has not yet been studied but may deserve a deeper evaluation.

The KMO value was 0.89 while Bartlett's test of sphericity was highly significant (χ 2 = 2045.50, p -value <0.001) suggesting that there were correlations within the dataset appropriate for factor analysis.

All second order interactions with subject were highly significant ( p < 0.001) indicating substantial individual variability in how thresholds were affected by stimulation mode, electrode location, and auditory training.