“highly significant”

There was a significant operator effect on mean body shape, with all pairwise tests displaying highly significant differences between operators ( P -value <0.001 for all comparisons; Table 1 ), supporting the exploratory between-group PCA ( Fig. 2 ).

The findings indicate a significant relationship between BMI and changes in cardiovascular autonomic function, as shown by a correlation coefficient of 0.60 and a highly significant statistical result (p < 0.001).

Type-III ANOVA identified highly significant main effects of grazing (F = 62.67, P < 0.001, partial η 2 = 0.68) and fertilization (F = 14.44, P < 0.001, partial η 2 = 0.49), with a moderate interaction effect (F = 4.00, P = 0.029, partial η 2 = 0.21; Supplementary Table 1 ).

Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05 (significant), p < 0.01 (highly significant), and p < 0.001 (very highly significant). 3.

Regarding BPI severity score, changes in pain between T0 and the three following visits were statistically highly significant ( p < 0.001).

Time point explained most of the observed variation and was highly significant (pseudo-F = 23.10, R2 = 0.755, p = 0.001; 999 permutations), consistent with the pronounced displacement of day 42 communities in the PCoA space.

By the general criteria of statistical field, the differences are considered to be statistically significant at P < 0.05, when P > 0.05, it is considered that there is no statistically significant difference between groups, by “ns”; when P < 0.05, there is a statistically significant difference between groups, indicated by (*); P < 0.01 indicates highly significant intergroup difference, indicated by (**); and P < 0.001 is an extremely significant difference, marked with (***).

ANC visits demonstrated a highly significant relationship ( p < .001), as did maternal tetanus vaccination ( p < .001).

Again, the differences were highly significant (p-value < 0.001).

The difference among the median [−2]proPSA repeated measures was highly significant at the Friedman test ( p < 0.001); all the differences between adjacent time-points were extremely significant ( p < 0.001), when investigated by the Wilcoxon test.

The pooled effect size is SMD = −0.60 (95% CI: −0.74 to −0.47), and the intervention effect has a highly significant statistical meaning (z = −8.63, p < 0.001). 4.1.2.

A highly significant association was observed between the type of therapy (empirical vs. definitive) and culture positivity ( χ 2 = 192.01, df = 1, P < 0.001), confirming that definitive therapy was strongly influenced by positive culture results.

However, the slope and strength of the relationship varied among species; feather δD increased with date in COYE ( b = 0.059 ± 0.025, r 2 = 0.025) and, more markedly, in WIWA ( b = 0.509 ± 0.106, r 2 = 0.148), but decreased with date in OCWA ( b = −0.154 ± 0.059, r 2 = 0.037) and YWAR ( b = −0.095 ± 0.037, r 2 = 0.033). For both plasma glycerol and β-hydroxybutyrate, there was a highly significant effect of year ( P < 0.001 in all cases; Table 1 ); however, the pattern of inter-annual variation was not consistent for these two metabolites.

Rayleigh’s Z values for seasonality of leaf initiation were mostly highly significant (Rayleigh tests, P < 0 . 001 , S2 Table ).

ANOVA findings confirmed that NAS and PVKUS did not show any toxicity and had highly significant (P<0.001) growth induction (14 and 33%, respectively) on SHED.

All three assays had increasing fibrosis with increasing Metavir scores, regardless of race, and the fit line was highly significant ( p < 0.001).

Comparing Group 1 with Group 2 demonstrated the upper face index and the mandible index to be highly significant, at P<0.001.

Fisher's exact test indicated a highly significant difference in the distribution of bacterial isolates between diseased and healthy tomato fruits ( p < 0.001), demonstrating complete ecological niche separation with no shared species between fruit health states (0% overlap).

The significance of G H was due to the fact that the first experiment was not significant (the upper bar of figure 2 a : G =1.95, p =0.16), whereas other two experiments were highly significant (the middle bar of figure 2 a : G =23.76, p <0.001, the lower bar of figure 2 a , G =26.0, p <0.001).

The size difference is statistically highly significant increased in the mutant (t-test analysis, p<0,001).

At 24 h, all four cell lines showed NIS expression and iodide uptake at MOI 1, with a highly significant difference (two-way ANOVA P <0.001) compared with cells treated with the competitive inhibitor of iodide uptake (potassium perchlorate) ( Figure 2c ).

Molecular mapping of QTLs associated with seed-Fe and Zn concentrations A highly significant difference (P < 0.001) of seed-Fe (51.3 ± 5.0, 40.3–67.0 ppm with 81% H 2 ) and Zn (36.0 ± 3.8, 27.9–48.5 ppm with 83% H 2 ) concentrations in two parental accessions and 277 individuals of a RIL mapping population [ICC 4958 (Fe: 43.0 ± 2.9 and Zn: 30.2 ± 2.5 ppm) × ICC 8261 (Fe: 64.8 ± 3.3 and Zn: 42.0 ± 2.7 ppm)] across two years based on ANOVA was observed ( Table S3 , Fig. 3A,B ).

For nanoemulsions, concentration effects were highly significant at 24 h (F (3,48) = 16.17, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.310), 48 h (F (3,48) = 14.74, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.290), and 72 h (F (3,48) = 15.65, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.303).

Reproducibility of the measurement was highly significant for interobserver variability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]=0.918, p <0.001).

The difference in behavioural skills between episodes was highly significant, with participants rating their abilities in taking medication lower for the non-adherent episode ( p < .001; d = 0.91, large effect).