Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantp<2.2e-160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Lastly, we compared the average TE ages between SUO and SLO genes in human and revealed a highly significant difference (p<2.2e-16, Wilcoxon Rank Sum test), with the former at 16.1% and the latter at 21.3% sequence divergence from their consensus sequences (For reference, 16–18% of unconstrained nucleotides have been substituted since the split of primates from other mammalian orders [32] ).
highly significantP < 2.2 × 10 –160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
When miRNA expression levels were averaged for tissue type across animals within the groups, Spearman’s rank correlations between PBMCs and the brain regions are all highly significant ( r s = 0.47–0.57; P < 2.2 × 10 –16 ), although pairwise correlations among the brain regions are markedly stronger ( r s = 0.86–0.99).
highly significantP = 2.2 × 10 −160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The P2′ statistic was found to be highly significant across the 57 X substitution lines ( P = 2.2 × 10 −16 ), thus indicating that genotype has an effect on the variation seen for the proportion of progeny sired by the experimental X chromosome male when he is the second to mate.
highly significantp value <2.2e-160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Strikingly, ten of these hypermethylated AIMS-Seq amplicons were located in the gene promoter region of the downregulated genes ( Aqp4 , Axin2 , Atad5 , Brca1 , Fads1 , Lgr5 , Phgdh , Slc1a2 , Slit2 , St3gal3 ) belonging to the expression signature of the intestinal stem cell [ 7 ], which represents a highly significant enrichment (Fisher exact test, p value <2.2e-16).
highly significantP < 2.2e-160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
For all three species comparisons, a linear regression of %ID and log 2 hybridization ratio showed a strong and highly significant correlation ( D. sechellia : Multiple R 2 = 0.3257, P < 2.2e-16; D. simulans : Multiple R 2 = 0.2920, P < 2.2e-16; D. yakuba : Multiple R 2 = 0.4083, P < 2.2e-16) (Figure 2 ), with the data for D. yakuba showing the strongest correlation.
highly significantp-value < 2.2e-160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
0.00276, Fisher's exact test p-value = 1.34e-05), there is a highly significant excess of sites supporting the species topology (0.00229 vs. 0.00210, Fisher's exact test p-value < 2.2e-16) and deficit of sites in these regions supporting ILS topologies (0.00042 vs. 0.00066, Fisher's exact test p-value < 2.2e-16, Fig 2B and 2C ), which suggests that the observed reduction of ILS is not the result of a lower mutation rate.
highly significantp < 2.2e−160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Regression analyses indicate a highly significant relationship between PSC accuracy ( cf . empirical species richness) versus wia ( F 1,8190 = 5615, adjusted R 2 = 0.4067, p < 2.2e−16; Figure 4a ), whilst the relationship weakens when positive (WIA) and uninfected (uWIA) predictions are combined ( F 1,8190 = 1933, adjusted R 2 = 0.1909, p < 2.2e−16; Figure 4b ).
highly significantP < 2.2 × 10 −160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
On the other hand, when we considered each individual base count independently, we observed that the count of G nucleotides specifically shows a stronger negative correlation (R = −0.22) than the C nucleotide count (R = −0.074) alone ( Figure S5 A), although both correlations are highly significant (P < 2.2 × 10 −16 ).
highly significantp value <2.2E16the decimal point is missing; read as 2.2e-16qualifiedgold
Interestingly, we have observed a much higher number of negatively correlated mRNAs than positively correlated ones with the medians of 430 and 1,022 for the positively and negatively co-expressed transcripts respectively, and the trend towards negative correlation was highly significant ( p value <2.2E16, Wilcoxon signed rank test) (Fig. 2 e, Additional file 1 : Supplemental Table S4).