“highly significant”

There was a highly significant difference between pregnant and non-pregnant women with respect to age (p < 0.001), JZV (p = 0.003), and JZV/EV (p < 0.001) on the day before transplantation.

All three were highly significant independent predictors ( P < 0.001 for each) (Table 4 ).

The relationship between age and head weight was highly correlated ( R 2 = 0.70) and highly significant ( F = 39.11; p < 0.001) for all bees ( Fig. 2A ).

The between-group difference at postintervention was large and highly significant (χ2 = 20.409; p < 0.001), which is consistent with a robust intervention effect (Table 6 ).

ASC also showed a highly significant adjusted difference between the groups after adjustment of duration of diabetes as a covariate (Wald χ2=29.810, p < 0.001*) (Table 4 ).

Validation of efficacy and safety of DCB treatment Offline QFR analysis was conducted on 52 diseased vessels, revealing highly significant differences in MLD and QFR before and after DCB treatment ( P < 0.001).

In the eccentric phase, the magnitude r was almost perfect for RKF (0.907–0.961), for RKE, LKE and LKF it was very large (0.875–0.962), all results were highly significant ( p = 0.001).

Patients reporting a subjective response after HD-ASCT had a highly significant longer OS as compared to those not reporting a subjective response ( n = 18, 75.0%; log-rank p < 0.001; Fig. 3 a).

(I) A highly significant difference ( p = 0.001) was found between the infiltration of coloring agent in the enamel and the dentine, all groups considered.

Relationship between internal load, sleep, and physical well-being On physical well-being, the calculated LMEM showed a highly significant effect of previous-day internal load (b = -0.001 [0.00004], t(2365.26) = -15.1, P < .001, η 2 p = 0.09 [0.07, 0.11]) and previous-night sleep quality (b = 0.23 [0.01], t(2655.24) = 16.41, P < .001, η 2 p = 0.09 [0.07, 0.11]).

The differences between groups were highly significant ( P < 0.001).

The results were highly significant with P < 0.001.[ 6 ] In accordance to Dr.

Cross‐lagged paths were all significant, with PDS wos as a highly significant predictor of sleep quality, B = −0.38, P < .001, as well as sleep quality significantly predicting of PTSD symptoms, B = −0.02, P = .01.

1a ) which was highly significant (t = 5.74; d.f. = 28; p < 0.001).

As expected, a highly significant difference in FIGO stage distribution was observed between the non-metastatic and metastatic groups ( p < 0.001), with all non-metastatic cases classified as early-stage disease (FIGO I–II) and all metastatic cases presenting with advanced-stage disease (FIGO III–IV).

A 2 × 2 repeated measures ANOVA on run length revealed a significant main effect of condition (feature versus conjunction; F (1, 15) = 48.8, p < .001; η partial_squared = 0.76) and of foraging measure (finger versus eye gaze; F (1, 15) = 21.0, p < .001; η partial_squared = 0.58) but also a highly significant interaction ( F (1, 15) = 23.6; p < .001; η partial_squared = 0.61).

Factor structure The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin measure of the sampling adequacy of our data was very high (0.958), and Bartlett’s test of sphericity (5326.7) was highly significant (p < 0.001).

Results showed a highly significant time x covariate interaction ( F (1, 16) = 15.84, p =.001, η 2 p = 0.48), with post-hoc tests revealing a non-significant negative relation of post-surgical hospital stay and child depressive symptoms at T1 ( r T1 = − 0.18, n.s. ), and a moderate positive non-significant correlation at T2 ( r T2 = 0.36, n.s. ).

Hepatotoxic SSOs 37, 43 and 47 induced a significant reduction in glutathione levels in mouse hepatocyte cultures while SSO 36 showed a mild but statistically highly significant reduction in GSH at 10 and 30 μM (p<0.001 using two-way ANOVA followed by Dunett’s multiple comparison test).

Statistical significance was determined based on P values, with * P < 0.05 considered statistically significant, ** P < 0.01 considered highly significant, and *** P < 0.001 considered extremely significant.

Both factors positively influenced the extraction of TPC, plasma protection, DPPH, red pigments, and FRAP, with their linear interaction being highly significant ( p < 0.001).

The fixed effect model analysis concedes a highly significant standardized mean difference for the engraftment of knockout HSPCs in the spleen compared to non-edited ones (95% CI, –1.00 to –0.327; P < 0.001) ( Fig. 3b ).

3.3.3 Comparison of HRQoL between usual care and collaborative care groups Patients in the collaborative care group experienced a mean increase of 28.01 ± 2.05 in HRQoL scores across the four domains (Physical, Psychological, Social and Environmental) by the final follow-up, which was highly significant (P < 0.001).

For extraversion, the difference between the center and the surrounding area was highly significant ( p < 0.001).

There was a substantial variation ( p ≤ 0.05) in ALT level and a highly significant difference ( p ≤ 0.001) in alkaline phosphatase (ALP).