“highly significant”

Statistical analysis showed a highly significant association (p<0.001) between admission status (ward vs ICU) and symptom severity across the five categories.

The rapidly-induced water deficit, quantified by leaf (Ψ L ) or branch water potential (Ψ B ), had a highly significant ( P < 0.001) effect on all studied parameters.

The interactions between tannin type and concentration (T × C) and tannin type and water level (T × W) were both highly significant ( p < 0.001) for all the analyzed variables except for dCP_BP ( p = 0.157), while the interaction between tannin concentrations and water level (C × W) was insignificant in all variables.

This analysis revealed highly significant main effects of tissue for all seven genes (all p < 0.001), indicating strong tissue specificity ( Supplementary Table S11 ).

A highly significant association was also observed between diagnosis and age group (p<0.001).

The discrepancy between data of the TWL obtained from control and CFA treated rats was also highly significant (*** p < 0.001) ( Figure 1B ). 3.3.

When the control group consisted of infants without funisitis or chorioamnionitis (Fun−/CA−), the association between funisitis and any IVH in the frequentist analysis was “highly significant” ( p < 0.001).

From the fourth day onwards, the browning index showed a highly significant contrast ( p < 0.001), with a value of 1.18 in the PA-treated fruit on the fourth day and a higher level of 1.72 in the CK group.

In addition, there was a highly significant interspecific variation in A growth at all sites and for both ES and LS groups ( P < 0.001; Figure S1 available as Supplementary data at Tree Physiology Online).

Significant differences between the mean values between wild-type and Tff1 KO mice are indicated by asterisks ( p ≤ 0.05: significant, *; p ≤ 0.01: highly significant, **; p ≤ 0.001: extremely highly significant, ***). 4.3.

In men, the differences were also highly significant (right hip: F = 168.17, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.114; left hip: F = 177.37, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.118). 3.2.4 BMD trends across years since menopause Female participants were grouped by years since menopause into eight 5-year intervals: non-menopausal, 1–5, 6–10, 11–15, 16–20, 21–25, 26–30, and >30 years.

The difference between Dielmo and Ndiop was highly significant in 2000 ( p < 0.001 ) but not in 2010 (p >0.20) .

Moreover, Kaplan–Meier survival analysis revealed a significant difference in overall survival between high and low ACSL5 expression groups (p = 0.013), while PRDX1 showed even stronger prognostic value, with an inverse survival trend and highly significant difference (p < 0.001) ( Figures 7J, K ).

The KMO coefficient was found to be 0.87, the chi-square value for Bartlett's test was highly significant (p < .001), and the data were suitable and sufficient for the factor analysis.

Differences between the clusters were highly significant for all parameters by ANOVA ( p ≤ 0.001), and significant differences were seen between Cluster 1 ( n = 26), Cluster 2 ( n = 59) and Cluster 3 ( n = 57) by Bonferroni post hoc test ( p ≤ 0.01), except for transferrin and serum iron.

Comparing the FABP1 cDNA transfected cells to the vector transfected cells at AAP concentrations of 0.5 mM, 1.0 mM, 5 mM, and 10 mM showed highly significant differences at the p < 0.001 level, while an AAP concentration of 20 mM was significant at the p < 0.01 level.

This analysis found no main effect but a highly significant interaction ( p < 0.001).

The correlation between both ways of assessing the hippocampal volumes was highly significant (left: r = 0.702, p<0.001; n = 145; right: r = 0.797, p<0.001, n = 145).

We highlight those that were highly significant ( p < 0.001) ( Table 3 ).

The Tissue × Origin interaction term was highly significant for all three enzymes ( P < 0.001), indicating that the immune expression of B. lenok under different growth environments is tissue-specific. 3.5 Analysis of antioxidant parameters As shown in Figure 5 , hepatic CAT activity and GSH content in the wild group were significantly higher than in the farmed group ( P < 0.01).

TAS2R38 supertasters are associated with lower risk of AD with the advancement of age From LME modeling of the longitudinal change in cognitive assessments and biomarkers in ADNI ( n = 2,168), highly significant interactions ( P < 0.001) were found between age and the alternative allele counts of each of the SNPs.

Moreover, there was a highly significant positive relationship between LAI and LI (r = 0.8745, p < 0.001) ( Table 2 ).

The fluorescence intensity increased progressively together with the cell numbers, with a highly significant ( p < 0.001) correlation coefficient for both (endometrial cells R = 0.993 and leukocytes R = 0.996).

However, North Macedonian teachers reported significantly better systemic support ( p ≤ 0.012) and highly significant differences in role division ( p < 0.001).

Bartlett test was highly significant ( p < 0.001).