“highly significant”

Effect of time was highly significant from retrospective-to-training F(1,177) = 44.73, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.202, from retrospectively-to-prospectively F(1,177) = 16.844, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.087, and over the whole time frame retrospectively-training-prospectively F(1,177) = 28.733, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.140.

The data analysis showed that the linear regression was highly significant ( P < 0.001), the intercept values were not significantly different from zero, and the correlation coefficient values (>0.999) indicated excellent linearity.

The adjusted multivariate analysis confirms the results regarding the diagnosis and CMV main effects with highly significant coefficients (R 2 = 0.24; F(7,232) = 10.23; p < 0.001; see Supplementary Table 3 ).

Hemorrhagic manifestations were significantly more prevalent among confirmed cases, particularly injection site bleeding (68%), ocular bleeding (80%), and subcutaneous bleeding (84%) in 2022, with all differences being highly significant ( p < 0.001).

Results: The mean horizontal advancement was substantial and highly significant (p < .001).

The overall model was highly significant (Omnibus test of model coefficients, p<0.001), confirming that the included predictors together contributed significantly to survival.

Results ANOVA revealed a significant group by electrode site by visual field interaction (ANOVA: F = 3.909, p =.049, η 2 = 0.005) as well as a highly significant electrode site by visual field interaction (ANOVA: F = 384.450, p <.001, η 2 = 0.447) and age group effect (ANOVA: F = 33.744, p <.001, η 2 = 0.039).

A two-way ANOVA showed highly significant differences ( p < 0.001) in enzyme activities for the factors, cultivar, years, and the interaction between cultivar and year.

The Chi-square test revealed a highly significant difference ( P < 0.001).

This rise of 7.11% in sputum positivity over routine is highly significant ( P =0.001021, χ 2 =10.78) with 44.11% increase in diagnosed cases.

those grouped as HFD (Churra from DataSet 1 + Assaf High-KKCF from DataSet 2) showed a highly significant result ( p -value = 0.00109) ( Supplementary Fig. 2B ).

The ISS ( p < 0.0001) and age ( p = 0.0224) however were significant risk factors, while BMI was highly significant and even revealed the strongest effect among the predictors ( p = 0.0011) (Table 2 ).

The 4 fold higher ratio in the rod TSSs was highly significant (p = 0.0011).

Although no parity history was available on these publicly available cases, upon applying our PPBC gene signature to this YWBC cohort ( n = 311 patients with both ER+ and ER− disease) we observed a highly significant decrease in 15-year overall survival in breast cancer patients with a PPBC Hi signature score (HR 2.134, p = 0.0011) compared with those with a low score (PPBC Lo, Fig. 5f ).

The differences between CC+ and CC− were not significant on any testing day for the control group ( p = 0.60 and p = 0.13, for days 1 and 3, respectively); however, for the YKS group, the difference was highly significant ( p = 0.0011 and p = 0.023, for days 1 and 3, respectively).

Differences among genotypes were highly significant for t 95 [ F (9,37)=4.05, P =0.0011] and for t 75 – t 25 [ F (9,36)=3.14, P =0.0068], and marginally significant for t 25 [ F (9,39)=2.22, P =0.041].

ARRDC2 , located in the cytoplasmic vesicle and plasma membrane and predicted to be involved in protein transport 28 , showed a highly significant positive linear correlation to lesion growth rate ( R = 0.99, p = 0.0011) (Fig. 3 ).

The resulting difference between treatment groups for the mean change in visual acuity of individual eyes from baseline of RHODOS to the RHODOS–OFU study visit was highly significant, logMAR −0.228 (11 letters; P = 0.0011; Table 2 ), in favour of the idebenone group for patients carrying one of the three primary mitochondrial DNA mutations and logMAR −0.283 (14 letters, P = 0.0002) for patients carrying either the m.11778G>A or m.3460G>A mutation.

Analysis of correlation between the number of cases in DECs with those reported from non-DECs shows a highly significant correlation ( P = 0.0011) when the comparative datasets are offset by 4 years (i.e.

Taif was found to be higher prevalence of asthma patients than the other 2 cities, with a statistically highly significant difference ( P = .0011) in this study.

Subregional analyses revealed that this increase was highly significant in the caudal DG (71%; p = 0.0011), but non-significant in the rostral DG (p = 0.29) ( Fig. 2A ).

This was highly significant ( p -value = 0.0011) when compared with the non-clustered (non-CRC) blood isolates, suggesting a possible association between certain specimen types and certain Bp clusters.

These differences between CMV-positive and negative animals are statistically highly significant (p=0.0011, Figure 2B ; p<0.0001, Figure 2C ).

The permutation test yielded highly significant differences between the two groups with p = 0.0011 and p = 0.0014 for dimension 0 and dimension 1, respectively (10000 permutations).

The difference between monotherapy and polypharmacy was highly significant ( p = 0.0011 [t = 3.276; df = 748]).