“highly significant”

The statistical test to reject homogeneity of the OR was highly significant (p=0.006).

Greater willingness to evacuate from home showed a highly significant relationship with high income (>$80,000) compared to very low income (<$20,000) (AOR=3.01, p=0.006); and was also positively associated with female gender (AOR=2.01, p=0.012), and high self-rated personal resilience (AOR=1.87, p=0.010).

There was a highly significant association between psychological stress and duration of use of VDT, using the Chi-square test (p = 0.006).

The rmMANOVA indicated a highly significant main effect for the factor condition (F=3.3, p =0.006).

An Analysis of Variance test found that there was a highly significant difference in the system decay rates underlying these CARm values ( p -value = 0.006).

Here, we observed a highly significant elevation of spontaneous oscillatory events in the low gamma band [21–40 Hz] with the largest effect size of Cohen’s d = 1.258 in the T- (Kruskal-Wallis test: p = 0.006; post hoc : p = 0.029) compared to the C- and the TH-group ( post hoc : p = 0.029, Figure 9A ).

However, The main effect of distractor type was found highly significant, F 1 (2,100) = 5.4, p = .006, η 2 p = .09; F 2 (2,158) = 4.17, p = .01, showing participants were significantly slower at launching a saccade towards the target in the referent competitor condition (551.59 ms, SE = 12.9) and the translation cohort competitor condition (552.16ms, SE = 13.2) than in the condition when the target was accompanied by unrelated distractors (533.14ms, SE = 13.2)(See S1 Dataset ).

The difference in sensitivity between the ACR score and the Avise Lupus test was highly significant (p=0.006) (Table 2 ).

However, there was a highly significant 31.5% increase in NgR expression between schizophrenia and control subjects (F 1,29 =8.900; P =0.006; Figure 1c ) in the CA3.

Multivariate analysis for the pain scores as dependent variables showed that HADS was a highly significant factor ( p = 0.006) in determining pain for VAS, WOMAC, and PPT, and BMI a very significant factor ( P < 0.001) for VAS and WOMAC ( Figure 4 ).

As seen in the Table 5 , the patients with a score of >6 did not have any visual improvement in the post-op period, which is highly significant ( P = 0.006).

Moreover, the interaction between self-reported history of neuropathy/nerve problems and glycemia arm continued to remain highly significant ( P = 0.006) after adjusting for age, sex, waist circumference, smoking, diabetes duration, hypoglycemic agents used, history of retinopathy, history of amputation, and systolic blood pressure.

In addition, a highly significant difference ( p = 0.006) was identified between MA60-treated, influenza virus-infected mice and the placebo-treated, mock-infected group.

In this model, maximum temperature was a highly significant ( p = 0.006) variable for onion yield.

Among those that received a DTP booster before enrolment there was a significantly beneficial effect of BCG, whereas those who had no DTP before BCG were significantly more likely to die; the interaction between DTP booster status and BCG being highly significant (p=0.006).

The correlation became more pronounced (r = .698) and highly significant (p ≤ .006) once normalized for body mass between nitrogen intake/kg body weight/day and nitrogen balance/kg body weight/day.

In multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis with adjustment for cardiovascular risk factors we found this difference to be highly significant ( p = 0.006).

Post-hoc Bonferroni comparisons showed a statistically highly significant difference between DPI and Pyrax (p=0.006) and a significant difference between DPI and Quick Ashvin (p=0.028).

Together with the essential logit transformation of qIHC scores, this approach reduced the noise of measurement as demonstrated by uncovering a highly significant, strong association between mRNA and protein expressions of S100A4 (Spearman’s coefficient ρ = 0.72 ( p = 0.006)).

A one-way ANOVA showed a highly significant effect of plant genotype on this measure of aphid performance ( F =6.63; P =0.006).

men when compared to sex-matched controls, with LA booster EF becoming highly significant ( p = 0.006).

Highly significant improvements in comprehension of the approach to ear reconstruction ( p = 0.006) and locating the subunits of a reconstructed ear from costal cartilage ( p = 0.003) were also noted. 100% of participants felt the 3D printed teaching aids directly enhanced their learning.

Immunofluorescence revealed highly significant changes in the CK network within amniocytes with dense CK aggregates and retraction from the cell periphery (all p = 0.006).

In addition, a highly significant increased ratio of OXT-ir/CRH-ir was found in BD ( p= 0·006, Mann-Whitney U test, Figure 2 i), but not in MDD, patients compared with their respective controls.

The robust and favorable association in Model 2 remained highly significant (OR 1.1; 95% CI 1.0, 1.2; p = 0.006) after accounting for factors such as gender, age, and race.