“highly significant”

The sowing dates had an extremely significant ( P < 0.001) impact on the overwintering rates, and highly significant ( P < 0.01) effects on taproot diameter, crown diameter, and crown depth, and also had a significant ( P < 0.05) effect on the taproot length.

These correlations were found to be highly significant (p-value< 0.01).

Upon analyzing the highly significant (BH adjusted P -value < 0.01) genes having extreme Log 10 OR scores, strong corroboration with existing literature was found.

The absence of significant differences is indicated by identical letters ( p > 0.05), while different lowercase letters denote significant differences ( p < 0.05), and different capital letters signify highly significant differences ( p < 0.01). 3.

LB had a highly significant effect on LA and AA ( p < 0.01) and a significant effect on NH 3 -N/TN ( p < 0.05).

However, significant ( p < 0.05) and highly significant ( p ≤ 0.01) differences were noted in the contents of some SFAs (C6:0, C8:0, C10:0, C12:0, C14:0, C16:0,andC17:0) and UFAs (C18:1n9c, C18:1n9t,C18:1n7t, C18:2n6c, CLA, C18:3n3, and C20:1),as well as in the total contents of SFAs and UFAs ( Table 2 ) between the genotypes of the SNP g.841G/C.

Statistical significance was defined as 0.01 ≤ p < 0.05, highly significant as p < 0.01, and a significant trend as 0.05 ≤ p < 0.10. 3.

Notably, IbAGPL3 expression was highest in the fibrous ( Figure 9 E) and storage roots ( Figure 9 G) under EN treatment, showing highly significant ( p < 0.01) differences. 2.9.

Subsequently, examination on apoptosis of H9c2 cells by FC assay demonstrated a highly significant increase of H9c2 cells with IR modeling (Fig. 3 C, P < 0.01).

The results are expressed as ‘mean ± standard error’, where a single asterisk (*) indicates a significant difference at p < 0.05, while a double asterisk (**) signifies a highly significant difference at p < 0.01 [ 38 ]. 3.

Urate oxidase activity exhibited a highly significant positive correlation ( p < 0.01) with ARA and a significant positive correlation ( p < 0.05) with SNA in nodules. 3.

The increased nitrogen content in the kernels was observed to enhance dry matter content, plant height, and yield, showing highly significant positive correlations ( p < 0.01).

The measurements of background- and noise-adjusted imaging signal averaged using 50–80 individual cells showed that the differences between the WT and CRISPRi cell groups were highly significant ( p < 0.01) with approximately 2-times higher binding/uptake by WT cells observed at the early time point (30 min).

There was a significant positive correlation between unclassified Erysipelotrichaceae and ADG ( P < 0.05), a highly significant negative correlation between Clostridium sensu stricto 1 and ADFI ( P < 0.01), and a significant negative correlation between Romboutsia and ADFI ( P < 0.05).

2 ) in controls, indicating that IONPs lead to a statistically highly significant reduction of this parameter (p < 0.01).

Furthermore, the ginger-treated groups showed a highly significant (p < 0.01) increase in HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C) and a high decrease (<0.01) in LDL-cholesterol and VLDL-cholesterol compared with the control group.

Comparison of EPI Levels before and after Exercise in MICT, HIIT, and MICT+BFR Groups It was found that (1) there was no statistically significant difference in EPI levels among the groups before exercise ( p > 0.05); (2) compared with the pre-exercise EPI levels, the difference in blood EPI levels among the subjects in the MICT and MICT+BFR groups after exercise was significant ( p < 0.05), with increases of 8.3% and 18.1%, respectively; and (3) compared with the pre-exercise EPI levels, for the HIIT group, the difference in blood EPI levels in subjects after exercise was highly significant ( p < 0.01), with an increase of 30.4%, as shown in Table 1 .

The GO terms of each cluster were sorted based on their P value as follows: (1) not significant (NS), (2) significant ( P < 0.05, gray) and (3) highly significant ( P < 0.01, dark gray).

There were substantial correlations ( p < 0.05) and highly significant correlations ( p < 0.01) between different metals ( Table 3 ).

Except for δ 15 N, the effects of intra- and inter-provenance were highly significant ( p < 0.01).

The statistical significance of the differences was determined as follows: nonsignificant (marked as “ns”) for p values > 0.05, significant (marked as “*”) for p values < 0.05, highly significant (marked as “**”) for p values < 0.01, and extremely significant (marked as “***”) for p values < 0.001, or (marked as “****”) for p values < 0.0001. 3.

Notably, the inhibitory effect of 4 mM butyric acid was highly significant ( P < 0.01).

Values were considered statistically significant when p < 0.05, highly significant when p < 0.01 and extremely highly significant when p < 0.001. 3.

Comparing LRF scores of both listening conditions at the end of the TCAD, a highly significant difference was observed ( p < .01), with an overall higher LRF score in the unaided condition.

(significant, * p < 0.05; highly significant, ** p < 0.01). 3.