However, a highly significant, strong direct association was expressed between BMI and adiponectin in the controls before intervention (r = 0.83, p = 0.00004).
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
The comparison of the frequency of AML specific mutations in the PDX panel and data of an AML patient population from TCGA revealed a highly significant correlation of both data sets (Pearson correlation coefficient 0.81, p < 0.00004).
The results of decaycorrected ex vivo organ activity (Table 1 ) confirmed the in vivo measurements and showed a highly significant correlation (Spearman’s Rho: 0.9091; p = 0.00004; mean difference ratio: 0.92; lower limit of agreement: 0.65; upper limit of agreement: 1.20).
However, the rate at which the therapist provided prompts was a highly significant predictor of subject response rate ( b = 0.480, p = 0.00004; Figure 3 ).
This difference in proportions is highly significant ( P < 4E-5, Fisher’s exact test, two-sided).
Of the remaining 55 CI users and 47 NH controls, we see a highly significant difference between p(McGurk) measures (t (81.0) = −4.9, p = 4 × 10 −5 , d = 0.24).
Thus, the statistical evaluation showed a much lower relapse rate in the group with uncomplicated UTIs in comparison to complicated or recurring UTIs for all three analyzed time periods, which was highly significant ( p = 0.00004).
A-levels education and no education both showed highly significant associations with delayed recall (p=4.0e-5 and 7.7e-7) and learning (p=7.6e-6 and 5.0e-8).
Further, using all available follow-up (median 8.6 years), the absolute difference between treatments was substantially larger (60 vs 24 cases, 5.26% vs 2.07%, difference 3.19%) and this difference in proportions was highly significant ( P = 0.00004) [[ 13 ], Table 3].
The Pearson correlation coefficients of the genome size to the decay rate were highly significant ( cor = 0.684, p = 4e-5) and were comparable to the growth rate ( cor = 0.772, p = 6e-7).
In addition, no genotype x diagnosis interaction was exposed [ F (1,2, 112) = 0.389, p = 0.678], though there was a highly significant effect of diagnosis on the error rate [ F (1, 116) = 19.02, p = 0.00004] (Fig. 2 a).
sIL‐2R levels correlated with TMTV Pearson's correlation tests demonstrated highly significant positive correlation between sIL‐2R and TMTV ( R 2 = 0.490; P = 0.00004, Figure 2 A). 3.4.
A strong and highly significant positive correlation was also found between p-tau217 and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), a marker of cellular damage and systemic inflammation ( r = 0.595, p = 0.00004; Figure 3 B).
In Table 1 , the results of the model averaging are displayed with the factors contained in the final, all being highly significant (tissue p = 4 × 10 −5 ; density/tissue p = 0.0006; density p = 0.004) with the exception of the factor gene, which was marginally significant ( p = 0.06).
We found a highly significant inverse correlation (p = 0.00004, r = −0.734) between these two clinical scores ( Table 2 + Supplemental Fig.
Results The proportion of mothers not breastfeeding at four months of age showed a highly significant trend across the neighbourhood strata (p = 0.00004): from 16.3% (< 10% with low purchasing power) to 29.4% (≥ 30% with low purchasing power), yielding an OR of 2.24 (95% confidence interval: 1.45-3.16).
Analysis of variance based on the longitudinal mixed-effects model revealed a highly significant main effect of treatment group ( p = 0.00004), whereas neither the main effect of time ( p = 0.17076) nor the group × time interaction ( p = 0.89380) reached statistical significance (Supplementary File 2 ).
In the simpler model without the interaction term, there was a highly significant effect of gender (beta = 49.5, 95% CI 26.7 to 72.3, p = 0.00004), but no significant effect of genotype on TGMV (beta = −1.973, 95% CI −19.4 to 15.4, p = 0.822).
Regression analysis on all data points found a weak, but highly significant, positive relationship between sensation level and P1 amplitude ( r =0.41) [ r 2 =0.17, F(1.90)=18.6, P=0.00004, intercept=2.79 μV, slope=0.09 μV/dB].
Results Stimulus Ratings The results of the repeated-measures ANOVA show a highly significant interaction between condition, pitch, and response ( F (6, 78) = 23.31, ε = 0.22, P = 0.00004, η p 2 = 0.64).
Results As expected, a highly significant association (p = 0.00004) was found with rs3763313, corresponding to the well established major effect of the MHC [12] .
Three-parameter linear/ k th-power regression fits obtained to each combined set of ARE- bla - or ARE- luc -assay response data provided good fits ( R 2 = .99 or .91, respectively, P fit > .99) that each incorporate a highly significant negative initial linear slope ( P = 4 × 10 −5 or .00025) and an overall J-shaped DR pattern.
A highly significant difference was detected in hemoglobin levels among GSD1b patients (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, V = 253, p -value ≈ 4.028e−05).
There was a total of 16 variants of the GTF2F2 region that produced a highly significant signal ( P = 4.1 × 10 -5 - 5.28 × 10 -6 ), whereas the two variants of KCTD4 were not associated with NCP 4 ( P = 0.02 - 0.03).
Consistent with these opposite changes in rates, there was a highly significant drop in the correlation of events in the two networks ( n = 9 brain slices; pre‐cut R 2 range = 0.83–0.98; post‐cut R 2 range = 0.33–0.58; P = 4.1 × 10 −5 ; Wilcoxon rank sum test).