“highly significant”

Determination of Photoinhibitory Activity of Eosin Y and Green LED Light Using the Statistical Experimental Design The results in Table S1 (ANOVA) demonstrated that this mathematical model is highly significant ( p = 0.000034) and did not show lack of fit ( p = 0.401258).

The first method reported highly significant values for Pagel’s lambda statistic (λ = 1.002, p = 3.4 × 10 -5 ) ( Pagel, 1999 ), and Blomberg’s K statistic ( K = 1.609, p = 0.001) ( Blomberg et al., 2003 ), indicating in both cases a strong phylogenetic signal for diploid number ( Figure 4A ).

We found a highly significant - more than 25% - increase in this measure for PCP-treated rats compared to SAL-treated controls (Fig. 2f , F[3,55] = 9.59, P = 3.44 × 10 −5 ; SAL, 0.72 ± 0.02, PCP, 0.91 ± 0.04, P = 1.0 × 10 −4 ), which was fully rescued by acute D-serine treatment (Fig. 2f , PCP + D-serine, 0.75 ± 0.02, vs.

The difference in distribution between cleaners, nurses, and interns was statistically highly significant ( p = 3.5 E−05, OR = 10.5, 95% CI: 2.8–39.5). 4.

The increase of 12.9% in the gamma power from P 100 N 100 to P 100 N 100 Att was highly significant ( p = 3.5×10 −5 , N = 96, t test).

This approach was further supported by a highly significant effect of the learning configuration × experimental phase interaction ( F = 10.4; p = 3.52 × 10 −05 ) when expanding the model across both phases.

In the TCGA breast cancer dataset, we found a highly significant enrichment of Rank-1 cis genes among genes with amplification-driven gene dependencies (Fisher test one-sided P-value = 3.53e-5).

Nonetheless, the highly significant p -value we obtain for the association mitochondrial genes and AAO of PD ( p -value = 3.56E-05) and the recognized importance of mitochondrial function in aging would suggest that this finding is likely to be robust.

In model B, the significance level did not change much and remained highly significant ( p = 3.6 × 10 –5 ) ( Table 3 ).

We found a highly significant association ( p = 3.6 × 10 −5 ), with secondary bile acid-producing genes only predicted to be present in samples that also had high predicted levels of butyrate-producing genes (Fig. 7b ).

According to an ANOVA analysis the difference in plant biomass is highly significant ( p -value = 3.64e-05) between the two treatments.

The DAVID program identified one cluster, characterized by a highly significant enrichment of genes involved in antigen processing and presentation ( p = 3.7e-5).

Treatment effects were highly significant on both day 6 ( p = 3.7 × 10 −5 ) and particularly day 10 ( p = 2.3 × 10 −9 ).

However, PAR in the recently colonised areas and the nearest range core sites (Fennoscandia, Baltic countries, Germany, and Poland) showed a highly significant negative relationship with latitude ( r 2 = 0.92, β = −3.96 × 10 −4 , SE = 4.31 × 10 −5 , t = −9.19, p = 3.73 × 10 −5 ).

Simply combining all genes (excluding those on the X chromosome) into a single confusion matrix yields highly significant predictability scores (Fig. 3g , average score = 2.2, p ~ 3.74e-5, 3 time points, 5 quads).

The difference between either of these cohorts and the mutant IDH1 cohort is highly significant (p = 3.8 × 10 −5 ; and 4.0 × 10 −4 , respectively; Figure 2A ).

4d , left); an increase in mutational frequency with age was highly significant for males ( p = 3.8 E − 5 ), but not for females.

Other highly significant associated pathways in this module are all immune-related, of which the most significant is Natural killer cell mediated cytotoxity (P-value = 3.8E -5 ).

1.95 μg/g, respectively; p = 0.00042), and a similar, highly significant elevation was observed for Cu (median 61.68 vs. 38.43 μg/g, respectively; p = 3.81e-5).

Ketamine concentrations also showed a highly significant difference ( W = 264, adjusted P = 0.0000389), again with higher concentrations recorded in England.

The difference between the two areas was highly significant (two-sample t test, t (1405) = 3.2, p = 3.9 × 10 −5 ).

Polarity and fiber content showed highly significant variation (F = 17.27, p = 3.97 × 10 -5 ; and F = 34.73, p = 8.12 × 10 -9 , respectively).

In this study, ANOVA of PBD demonstrated that the model was highly significant, as evident from a Fisher’s F -test value of 12.91 with a very low probability value ( p = 0.0000399; Table 2 ).

We found a highly significant inverse correlation (p = 0.00004, r = −0.734) between these two clinical scores ( Table 2 + Supplemental Fig.

ANOVA demonstrated highly significant differences in the average volume per tree among the four formulas ( p value = 0.00004) for both standing tree and log volume, and further analysis using Tukey’s HSD indicated that the Quarter girth and form factor–based formula for standing trees differed significantly from the allometric equation for standing timber, while other formula combinations did not show significant differences.