As expected, the discriminatory ability of all five cryptic RNAs was highly significant ( P < 0.0001) in the frontal cortex and amygdala in FTLD-TDP, with AUC ranging 0.79–0.98 in amygdala and 0.81–0.94 in frontal cortex (Fig.
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
There was a highly significant difference between CS and CHF patients in changes (OUT-IN) in the Barthel Index (P<0.0001).
The model was highly significant (F = 140.53, P < 0.0001), whereas the lack of fit was not significant (F = 3.62, P = 0.1228), indicating that the model adequately described the relationship between ultrasound parameters and VAP solubility.
The log-rank test confirmed a highly significant difference in the survival distributions between the two groups ( P < 0.0001).
However, treatment with NaBu during the transition span (21–42 days; Figure 2 ) yielded a highly significant increase in longevity ( p < 0.0001) at either dose.
The highly significant interaction ( P < 0.0001) between external osmotic strength and temperature for the condensation phenotype strongly indicates the interdependence of these two factors.
Nevertheless, the correlation for the change in diet soda vs the change in regular soda was highly significant, r = -0.67, P = 0001.
As presented in Table 4 , the model was highly significant ( p < 0.0001) with a non-significant lack of fit ( p = 0.0913).
Species was also highly significant ( P < 0.0001; Table 1 ), with fir having an earlier phenology than spruce, with a mean difference of about 6 d between species.
A two-way ANOVA detected a highly significant effect of light on E PAR (F1,74= 132.20, p < 0.0001) and a significant species vs. light interaction (F3,74 = 9.71, p < 0.0001), while for the main effect of species no significant differences were detected ( p = 0.627).
, For example, the elongated contours in Figure highlight a strong synergistic effect between reflux ratio and feed tray location on hydroquinone purity, consistent with ANOVA results identifying the X 1 X 3 interaction term as highly significant ( P < 0.0001).
The ANOVA results ( Table ) for the quadratic model evaluating the adsorption capacity of SiNH 2 @FeNP-MK demonstrate that the model is highly significant ( P < 0.0001), with an F -value of 47.56.
The overall model was highly significant, with an exceptionally low p-value ( p < 0.0001) and a high F-statistic (F = 95.87).
There was a strong and highly significant correlation between the pre- and postoperative lamellar thicknesses at all time points (p < 0.0001).
Superoxide dismutase, glutathione peroxidase and catalase activities were highly significant ( p < 0.0001) in the treatment groups compared to the control.
S3 ; Table S9 ) and highly significant ( P < .0001) association with skin microbiome dissimilarity across all beta-diversity metrics.
To see if whole tumour GREM1 expression correlated with this classification we used The Cancer Genome Atlas RNA-Seq data to match sporadic tumour samples to the published CCS1, CCS2 and CCS3 subtypes and found a highly significant correlation between high GREM1 expression and CCS3 subtype tumours ( P < 0.0001, ANOVA) ( Fig. 5d ).
The chi‐square test result indicates a highly significant association between this perception and the participants’ responses ( χ 2 = 32.202, p = 0.0001), as shown in Table 2 .
For the risk level model (Table 3 ), the Spearman rank correlation coefficient between the originally measured PROCAM scores and the corresponding predicted risk level values was 0.74, which was highly significant (p < 0.0001).
The TPC model was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), confirming that the selected factors substantially influence extraction yield.
Despite a relatively narrow sampling interval (see methods), we were able to detect a highly significant dependence of sampling time on participant’s MSF sc chronotype ( Supplementary Figure S1A , Pearson’s correlation r = 0.17, p < 0.0001).
In that study, Se-HBV’s relation to toxic effects of CH 3 Hg exposures was highly significant ( F = 161.0, p < 0.0001) and consistent (adjusted R 2 = 0.735).
This underscores the protective role of Prxs, since it suggests that the ability of transferring Prx2 to the erythrocyte cell membrane and of releasing Prx5 in the plasma goes in hand with a milder ASD phenotype. Plasma Prx5 levels are suggestive of ASD Since the difference in Prx5 plasma levels between ASD and TD subjects was highly significant (p < 0.0001 by Mann–Whitney test), we calculated the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve.
Results: A highly significant elevation ( P <0.0001) was found in survivin protein and total p53 levels in acute lymphoblastic leukemia children patients at diagnosis compared to controls.
hyodysenteriae WC antigen in the 20 pigs on the uninfected farm A did not show a significant change during the course of experiment, while there was a highly significant ( P < 0.0001) increase with time in the cohort on infected farm C (Figure 2 , panel A).