“highly significant”

2 a), and differences among feeding groups were highly significant (ANOVA F 7, 88 = 292, P < 0.0001 for FB NY ; F 6, 54 = 204, P < 0.0001 for MC SC ).

This difference is highly significant (p = 0.0001), confirming the better tolerance of anticoagulant treatment with LMWH.

The increase in nuclear AR-V7 expression between HSPC and after AA or EZ treatment was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), as was the increase in nuclear AR-V7 between pre and post AA or EZ ( p = 0.007) treatment biopsies.

The correlation coefficient between drip loss and colour score of LM was negative and highly significant (r = −0.62, P < 10 −4 ); two adjacent SNPs associated with both traits were within a region of 11.12 Mb (between 84.83 and 95.95 Mb) on SSC9, which indicates that this region may contain a pleiotropic QTL (Table 3 ).

The Wilcoxon test determined there are highly significant differences in SHAPE reactivity between groups for both SLA and SLA′ ( P < 0.0001 for SLA; P < 0.05 for SLA).

The PR-A / PR-B ratio was significantly increased after 6 h in vitro culture ( p = 0.0487) and highly significant beyond 24 h culture ( p < 0.0001) ( Figure 1(d) ). 3.2.

*, P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant, **, P < 0.01 was considered highly significant, and ****, P < 0.0001 was considered extremely significant.

Compared to the total number of candidate genes (2476) from the SSH.qtl intervals and the number of known genes on autosomes (22,644, also excludes mitochondrial genes and haplotypes) this result is highly significant ( p < 0.0001) based on a hypergeometric test, which suggests positive enrichment of CF genes in the identified SSH.qtl intervals.

This change was highly significant, as indicated by one-way ANOVA analysis (p<0.0001).

There are highly significant differences of SOD level between rural and urban (P value 0.0001) on the one hand and between rural and industrial area (p ≤ 0.0001) in other.

The difference was highly significant ( P < 0.0001).

In contrast, native jugular veins showed a clear, dose-dependent relaxation, reaching highly significant differences at the maximal concentration ( p < 0.0001 vs. all graft groups; Fig. 2 A).

OA exhibited a highly significant correlation between risk preference and choice strategy in the losses domain [ r (32) = 0.77, p < 0.0001], such that the closer their risk premium was to zero, the higher their choice strategy.

Figure 2B illustrates the comparison of true versus predicted ages, yielding a Pearson correlation coefficient r of 0.56 and a highly significant p -value ( p < 0.0001).

The model is expressed by the following equation: Y = 30.166 + 1.04125A − 1.26875B − 0.24C − 1.55AB − 0.2075AC + 0.4575BC − 2.168A 2 − 4.998B 2 − 2.7405C 2 Analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed that the quadratic model was highly significant (F-value = 675.07, p < 0.0001; Table 8 ).

The interaction term for eGFR and urine ACR was highly significant ( P <0.0001, multiplicative interaction term), indicating that eGFR significantly modified the association between urine ACR and incident AF (Table 2 ).

The weights estimated by this model match subjects' behavior very well, as shown by a comparison of model predictions and subjects' actual choices ( Figure 2 B) with the regression of actual observed weights on model predicted weights being highly significant in every individual subject (p < 0.0001; average R 2 [standard coefficient of determination] across subjects = 0.77; see Table S1 available online).

Differences in VSRQ scores across clinical severity groups were highly significant (p < 0.0001).

There was a highly significant decreasing trend in HPV-positive rate with increasing age ( P <0.0001) in both categories.

The enrichment of the identified proteins with oxidoreductase activity or involvement in cell redox homeostasis as determined using the ProfCom database was statistically highly significant (p<0.0001).

Prevalence among HC accounted for only 7% and the results were highly significant ( p <0.0001; Fig 1B ).

We found a highly significant positive correlation between the amount of C3d and BI in leprosy skin lesions (r = 0.9612, p<0.0001) ( Fig 7A ) .

The difference between application of sLFS during exploration of one novel cue and sLFS alone ( n = 14) was highly significant (ANOVA, F 1,71 = 34.45; P < 0.0001; n = 8).

Low- and High-Temperature Effects The Fraass fragility point determination revealed highly significant ( p < 0.0001) effects of HS and WS, in both control and short-term aging, on low temperature performance.

For the four different carbohydrates, at both time points, for leaves four, five, and six, the differences between sut1 and wild type were highly significant in all cases ( P <0.0001).