“highly significant”

3 Results 3.1 Effects of climate, geographic site, land-use system, and their interactions on tree diversity Among the factors tested, land-use system had a highly significant effect ( P < 0.0001) on tree species richness, abundance, evenness, and Shannon diversity indices ( Table 3 ).

One-way ANOVA revealed a highly significant difference between groups [ F (5,16) = 86.47, P < .0001, R 2 = 0.96], with significant variance heterogeneity detected by Brown-Forsythe ( P < .0001).

The log-rank test confirmed highly significant differences between categories (χ 2 = 517.7, df = 2, p < 0.0001), while the log-rank test for trend supported a strong linear association between increasing frailty and decreasing survival (χ 2 = 514.6, p < 0.0001).

Highly significant differences ( p < 0.0001) were seen for TPI, which supports the hypothesis that these breeds have a differentiated morphometry that influences their reproductive ability and environmental adaptation.

Highly significant positive association was recorded with Wolbachia studies (β = 7.09, SE = 0.770, p < 0.0001, 95%CI [5.590, 8.607]) and significantly negative association (β = −2.772, SE = 0.864, CI [−4.466, −1.079], p = 0.0013) was recorded with samples size.

Correlation of intermediate and extensive TILs groups -combined- also showed a highly significant positive correlation with survival (p < 0.0001).

The model was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), while the lack-of-fit was not significant ( p = 0.9735), and the R 2 value was 0.9323, indicating that the model had good fitting and predictive ability.

The model for VS was highly significant (F = 65.10, p < 0.0001) with a coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.991, an adjusted R2 of 0.976, and a predicted R2 of 0.864.

The statistical differences were highly significant (Chi-Square test: p < 0.0001, Fisher’s exact test: p < 0.0001, OR = 1.56, 95%CI: 1.278 to 1.904).

In the second cohort, the association was highly significant ( r = −0.60; P < 0.0001) ( Fig. 2 B ).

The difference in MIC between the two agents against the standard isolate was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), whereas the difference in MBC was not statistically significant ( p = 0.1030).

Group differences were modest at 25 μg/mL (GO vs MP, n.s.; GO@MP vs GO/MP, small but significant), but became highly significant from 50 μg mL −1 onward (two-way ANOVA with Tukey, ∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001 for GO@MP vs GO; frequently P < 0.001–0.0001 for GO@MP vs MP).

There were highly significant ( p < 0.0001) associations between the abnormal expression of E-cadherin and Vimentin, E-cadherin and β-catenin, Vimentin and β-catenin, SMAD4 and E-cadherin, and a significant association between SMAD4 and Vimentin ( p = 0.0003), and SMAD4 and β-catenin ( p = 0.001) as shown in Table 1 .

Our results manifest a highly significant correlation between longer surgical durations (≥3 h) and elevated incidence rates of SSIs ( p < 0.0001).

Both AI-based and human-based evaluations demonstrated highly significant reductions in root length between pre- and post-treatment measurements ( p < 0.0001).

Most of the questions of patient satisfaction were statistically highly significant ( p <0.0001).

This compares well with the finding of Bala et al ., in which seroprevalence of syphilis was reported to be 1.2%[ 11 ] while the overall seroprevalence of syphilis in a study from Maharashtra was found to be 0.7% (90/13,008).[ 12 ] In our study, we found that seroprevalence of syphilis by VDRL test among male patients was 5.02 (365/7278) while that in females was 0.74 (368/50,030), and the difference between the two was highly significant.( P < 0.0001) It is comparable to the report by Geusau et al .[ 13 ] Moreover, in a study conducted by Tankhiwale and Naikwade, the seroprevalence of syphilis in males and females was 1.73% (44 of 2537) and 0.4% (46 of 10414), respectively.[ 12 ] The higher seroprevalence of syphilis in males could be because of the fact that only the suspected patients or high-risk patients or patients attending STI clinic are usually tested for syphilis serology.

For the PMHS, the KMO amounted to 0.955 and Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity was highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

1 ) of both kidneys were greater in SCD patients as compared to controls, which was highly significant ( p <0.0001) for both the right and left sides.

A highly significant treatment effect was detected for the discrimination index (F(2, 21) = 157.2, p < 0.0001, R 2 = 0.9374).

Box-Behnken design analysis yielded a highly significant quadratic model ( P < 0.0001) with a non-significant lack of fit ( P = 0.5929), indicating excellent model adequacy and reliability (R 2 = 0.9962).

Indeed, permanent expression of LMP1 in the BJAB-tTA-LMP1 cell line induces significant down-regulation of telomere repeat binding factor 1 (TRF1), TRF2 and protection of telomere 1 (POT1) at both the transcriptional and translational level (the most impressive down-regulation (>60%) was observed in TRF2), resulting in a highly significant increase of multinucleated, LMP1+ RS-like cells ( p < 0.0001) on days 14 and 21 [ 67 ].

The regression indicated, using the Nagelkerke pseudo-R 2 , that 22% of the variance in HCW abuse was accounted for by these two predictor variables, with externally assessed gender role being highly significant (p < 0.0001) and being exposed or identifying as an MSM to the HCW not significant as a predictor (p = 0.38).

Conversely, highly significant differences were observed comparing NMRs between the LICs ( P <0.0001: ET vs.

Then, the non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test compared ccf-mtDNA levels in the three groups, resulting in a highly significant statistical difference (p-value < 0.0001).