Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantp < 0.00020.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The CCDR Score demonstrated moderate negative correlations with VSMT (r = −0.347, p = 0.008) and GFC_VSMT (r = −0.368, p = 0.005), as well as stronger negative correlations with GFC_CCDR (Regression) (r = −0.628), GFC_CCDR (Discriminant) (r = −0.504), and the GFC_Health Problems Score (r = −0.471), all of which were highly significant ( p < 0.0002).
highly significantp = 0.00020.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Given the fraction of total axis length that was asynapsed in these syp-1 RNAi mnT12 nuclei, the observed restriction of GFP::COSA-1 foci to synapsed segments (where homologs are closely juxtaposed) represents a highly significant (χ 2 test; p = 0.0002) departure from the distribution expected if GFP::COSA-1 foci were equally likely to occur on synapsed segments and asynapsed segments (where homologs are separated), consistent with the interpretation that these GFP::COSA-1 foci correspond to interhomolog recombination events. 6 Extended Data Figure 4.
highly significantp<0.00020.0× alphaqualifiedgold
For instance, nine of our candidate cancer genes were also contained in the Cancer Gene Census list, which comprises 487 genes causally linked to cancer [ 11 ], representing a highly significant enrichment ( Abl2 , Braf , Fbxw7 , Foxp1 , Ipo11 , Mllt3 , Fas , Pten , and Nf1 ; p<0.0002, Fisher’s exact test).
highly significantp = 0.00020.0× alphaqualifiedgold
At 6 months, both groups differed in a highly significant way: While ingrowth index in the CPC group was only 0.33%, it was 3.79% in the SPC group ( p = 0.0002) (Figure 6 ), indicating that after 6 months, a higher percentage of more than ten times in intra-implant bone formation occurred within the SPC implants.
highly significantp = 0.00020.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In the female subsample, the effects of DDSS and age were both highly significant (Q = 14.7; p = 0.0002, Q = 23.8; p < 0.0001, respectively), but the effect of DDSS on usability ratings was different for younger patients than it was for older participants (Q = 7.9; p = 0.005), suggesting that younger women (<52 years) showed greater usability rating differences between Ada and Rheport.
highly significantp = 0.00020.0× alphaqualifiedgold
However, subtle recovery differences in RPS between treatments were observed at distinct recovery times after the first values taken 12 hours after the eccentric exercise: the RPS differences between 12 and 36 hours post eccentric exercise were highly significant ( p = 0.0002) with blueberries, whereas only a slight difference was observed between these two time points in the control condition ( p = 0.031).
highly significantp=0.00020.0× alphaqualifiedgold
However, we did find a highly significant increase in the rare/common CNV ratio in the LFS patients carrying mutations in the TP53 DBD when compared to both controls (p=0.0002) and to patients carrying the p.R337H mutation (p=0.0156; Fisher-exact test) (Figure 1B ).
Number of rare germline CNVs and TP53 mutation types.
Orphanet J Rare Dis · 2012 · PMC3558401