Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantp = 0.00020.0× alphaqualifiedgold
This reduction was highly significant relative to that in CpG-A-treated cells from 10 healthy donors in 14 experiments ( p = 0.0002) and relative to control supernatants from Huh7.5 cells transfected with subgenomic replicon and rendered apoptotic by UV irradiation (p = 0.01).
highly significantp = 0.00020.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Noteworthy, RA-related phosphoprotein profile changes are unique to the CD19 + CD27 − IgD + IgM low/− subset of autoreactive B ND cells: nominal logistic fit demonstrated that RA predictive value of the combined phosphorylation profile of several major BCR signaling proteins and Ca 2+ levels in response to BCR stimulation [2] in B ND cells was highly significant (R 2 = 1.0, p = 0.0002), while in mature naïve CD19 + IgM + B cells this predictive value was substantially less evident (R 2 = 0.505, p = 0.053).
highly significantP = 0.00020.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Analysis of IL-18 (mean [min/max]: 2,385 [300–8,025] pg/ml) and ECP (mean: 1,509 [<100/4,625] ng/ml) in 23 paired samples showed a highly significant correlation (r s = 0.70, P = 0.0002) between this cytokine and the eosinophil-derived product in the airways.
highly significantp = 0.00020.0× alphaqualifiedgold
After regression analysis was performed, the quadratic polynomial regression equation describing the effects of CAR/GEL mass ratio (A), CS concentration (B), and GSA/CUR dosage (C) on the comprehensive score (Y) was obtained as follows: (11) Y = 0.66 − 0.041A + 0.019B + 0.036C + 0.061AB + 0.075AC + 0.027BC − 0.054A 2 − 0.091B 2 − 0.054C 2 Analysis of variance (ANOVA) for the response surface methodology (RSM) experiments ( Table 7 ) revealed the following: The regression model was highly significant ( p = 0.0002).
highly significantP = 0.00020.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Analyzing the data by geographic region, we see that the results are highly significant for America–Asia–Australasia (χ 2 = 12.22, P = 0.0002; Fisher's P = 0.0003) and Africa–Asia–Australasia (χ 2 = 9.71, P = 0.0009; Fisher's P = 0.0021), and still significant although not as highly so if one only considers Asia–Australasia (χ 2 = 3.178, P = 0.0373; Fisher's P = 0.1558).
highly significantp = 0.00020.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Interestingly, our data revealed that a highly significant increase in myocilin expression (11.8-fold) was observed in TM region of the responder eyes compared to vehicle-treated eyes ( p = 0.0002); and there was a fourfold increase in myocilin expression in GC responder eyes ( p = 0.0004) compared with GC non-responder eyes.