Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantp = 0.00030.0× alphaqualifiedgold
showed a trendp = 0.07531.5× alpha
In order to define an appropriate drug concentration, tetracycline response experiments were conducted, whereupon embryos infected with 1500 CFU SH1000 EryR (GMSA015) were immersed in sterile E3 medium containing a range of antibiotic doses for the duration of the experiment ( Figure S3A ).While 50 μg/ml tetracycline produced a highly significant, curative response ( p = 0.0003), 10 μg/ml tetracycline showed a trend towards curing ( p = 0.0753) and 5 μg/ml was entirely sub-curative ( p = 0.2181).
highly significantp = 0.00030.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Interestingly, we found a highly significant interaction effect between Distribution Type and Standard Vowel [ F (1,18) = 20.22, p = 0.0003, η p 2 = 0.53], which shows that the attested difference between unimodally and bimodally trained Dutch 2-to-3-month olds differs depending on the standard that they hear in the oddball test (see section Exploratory Results for the Four Groups).
highly significantp = 0.00030.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Figure 6 illustrates significant changes obtained for a number of atlantoaxial linear parameters based on the total sample of patients, including significant changes for Chamberlain by 0.93 mm ± 2.58 mm (p = 0.0055) and highly significant changes for CVT (p = 0.0003), OPT (p < 0.0001) and Redlund-Johnell/Petersson (p < 0.0001).
highly significantp=0.00030.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The cognitive performance, measured in the Y-maze task, revealed similar highly significant defects in GSK3α.KO and GSK3α.KOxTau.P301L mice in the number of entries and in alternations (p=0.0003 and p=0.0007 respectively; Table 2 ), although the index did not differ between either type of GSK3α-deficient mice and their respective controls.
highly significantp = 0.00030.0× alphaqualifiedgold
A regression for the likelihood of infection with genotype 2 or 3 at only low-elevation revealed a highly significant effect of log (Capture) ( p = 0.0003) (goodness of fit test, p = 0.97), with the probability of infection with these genotypes again decreasing as mosquito capture rate increased (Figure 2 B).