“highly significant”

The Type III Tests revealed several significant effects: The intercept was highly significant (Wald χ2 = 8,972,964.143, p < 0.001) Duration in seconds showed a strong effect (Wald χ2 = 27,881.261, p < 0.001).

Wilcoxon rank-sum tests comparing SSPGI and SDPGI distributions among the short sleep and combined long/intermediate sleep categories, and LSPGI and SDPGI distributions among the long sleep and combined short/intermediate sleep categories, revealed highly significant differences (P<0.001), confirming that SSPGI, LSPGI, and SDPGI effectively distinguish between the respective sleep duration categories.

A pseudo F-value of 18.34 was obtained, indicating that the differences among the groups were highly significant (p < 0.001).

0.8%), again with highly significant differences (p < 0.001).

From this, Bartlett’s test of sphericity statistic was highly significant ( p < 0.001) indicating that the data was factorizable.

LMEM yielded highly significant scores for Y (t = −15.6, p<<0.001), Z (t = −10.4, p<<0.001), and Y:Z (t = −32, p<<0.001) directions.

In Table 2A , overjet DC is presented, which shows no significant gender disparities and highly significant disparities among NC and different types of clefts (BCLP p < 0.001, UCLP p < 0.001 and UCL, p = 0.020).

All pairwise comparisons yielded highly significant differences (p < 0.001), confirming meaningful distinctions in classification performance.

In contrast, the omitted dimethyl disulfide and dimethyl trisulfide models showed highly significant results ( p ≤ 0.001 and ≤ 0.01, respectively).

All coefficients were statistically highly significant (p<0.001).

The neopterin level in TTI-positive donors was highly significant when compared to the neopterin level in healthy blood donors (P = 0.001) (Table 1 ).

However, a highly significant heterogeneity was identified in sleep duration ( Q value = 259.382, P < .001), suggesting that there may be a large variation in its instrumental variables.The horizontal pleiotropic test showed marginal significance (intercept = 0.019, P = .064), suggesting that there may be a slight pleiotropic bias.

Although this average for 44 countries (2009–2019) was only moderately above that of the HDI for all 189 countries in both 2009 (mean 0.677 ± 0.157) and 2017 (mean 0.709 ± 0.152), the difference was highly significant ( p < 0.001, Mann–Whitney U test).

The ANOVA also assesses whether the overall regression model is statistically significant: The model is highly significant, meaning pedagogical leadership practices significantly predict teachers’ job performance (F (1, 537) = 99.732, p < 0.001).

Chi-square values reveal highly significant differences (p < 0.001) in all outcomes.

In this study, the correlation coefficient between Folin–Ciocalteu reducing capacity results (FC) and the IC 50 values of the DPPH ⋅ quenching activity was highly significant ( p < 0.001), indicating that polyphenolics may play an important role in free radical scavenging [ 39 ].

The effect of fertility status of the bulls was highly significant ( P < 0.001) for JAC and ABL accounting for 47.64 and 21.65% of the total variance observed in the produced MFI upon lectin binding.

Mixed linear model analysis of these data showed that the hyperopic shift induced by red light was highly significant ( P < 0.001) while the refractive change under blue light was not significant ( P = 0.49).

All correlations were highly significant ( P < .001) and increased in strength as Vc levels decreased.

Each group was individually compared with the positive control and the statistical differences were shown, as follows: *: significant ( p < 0.05); **: highly significant ( p < 0.01); ***: extremely significant ( p < 0.001); and, ns: non-significant ( p > 0.05).

This decrease was highly significant (p < 0.001) with an effect size of 68%.

13 show varying success rates across different offset positions, Offsets y_n and z_p have perfect success rates (100%), resulting in highly significant differences from the overall mean success rate (94.2%, p < 0.001).

The functional enrichment of these genes showed that the genes assigned to the enzyme gene category 27 (e) were highly significant ( p < 0.001) for growth in both media (Fig. 1 C).

Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) Trajectory Probiotic intervention resulted in a continuous and highly significant reduction in fatigue severity across all time points (Friedman test: chi2 = 103.41, p < 0.001).

S2B.) Sorbitol and trehalose gave dose-dependent induction of HSP70 expression with the increase being highly significant (p < 0.001) at the 150 mM osmolyte concentration (Fig. 2 A,B).