“marginal significance”

As predicted in Hypothesis 3, feminist identification was associated with more perceived discrimination, albeit only with marginal significance ( b = 0.08, SE = 0.04, p = .065).

Although trails A was selected for investigation a priori on the basis of its correlation with MRI volumes, it should be noted that the effect on trails A was modest and would only reach marginal significance ( p =0.065) if strict Bonferroni correction were applied against all five domain scores in our neurocognitive battery.

Grouping studies by study design and source of controls revealed only marginal significance for the comparison of alleles ε4 with ε3 in hospital-based studies (OR =1.33, 95% CI =0.98–1.79, P =0.065, I 2 =30.2%).

For the SLCO1B1 521T > C genotypes, in male patients, the risk of enalapril-induced cough in SLCO1B1 521C allele carriers was higher compared with TT genotype carriers, with marginal significance (OR = 2.06, 95%CI = 0.92–4.62 , P = 0.065), while female patients were still strongly associated with SLCO1B1 521T > C genotypes distribution (OR = 2.04, 95%CI = 1.16–3.60, P = 0.012).

In the present study, tumor grade showed marginal significance (p=0.066) only for recurrence-free survival.

The ADS contributed independently to test anxiety with marginal significance (Δ R 2 = .015, F = 3.430, df = 163, P = .066) and to negative affect (Δ R 2 = .002, F = 1.091, df = 163, P = .298), suggesting a small incremental validity of ADS over AADS on negative criteria.

Associations with anxiety for their part tended to be weaker than associations with other mental disorders, reaching statistical significance for cross-sectional studies in t -test comparisons with personality disorder ( t = 2.61, df = 33, two-sided p = 0.014) and marginal significance ( t = 1.86, df = 97, two-sided p = 0.066) with depression.

However, the interaction yielded only marginal significance (Probability*DRD4: F 1,18 = 3.82, p = 0.066, partial η 2 = 0.18; Figure 1 ).

Care score was significantly higher among non-smokers in the total sample ( p < 0.001) and among females ( p < 0.001), while among males this association showed only marginal significance ( p = 0.066).

1b ), whereas hsa-miR-26b-5p showed marginal significance ( P = 0.066, log2 fold change = 0.20; Fig. 1b ).

Prior cancer history showed marginal significance (p=0.066) and was not retained.

At 6 months postoperatively, the PD group exhibited higher WBC ( p = 0.001), ANC ( p < 0.001), NLR ( p = 0.011), and PLT ( p = 0.031) than those in the non-PD group; a higher PLR, with marginal significance ( p = 0.066), was also observed in the PD group.

The 110 male OLP patients also had higher mean serum homocysteine level than 478 female OLP patients (marginal significance, P = 0.066).

The interference effect was increased in patients with schizophrenia with a marginal significance level ( p = 0.066).

The interaction between language and priming type reached a marginal significance (estimate = −18.977, t = −1.841, p = 0.066, 95% CI = [0.00, 1.00]), whose following analysis showed that Chinese morphological priming condition was associated with faster responses than Chinese semantic priming ( p < 0.01).

WBCs initially had a positive relationship with normal to mild dehydration severity, but in moderate to severe dehydration, an inverse relationship with weak and marginal significance is observed, as shown in panel D (Spearman’s rho, ρ = −0.224, p = 0.066).

This finding exhibited marginal significance ( p = 0.066), and post hoc power was estimated to be approximately 56% based on the observed effect size in our study.

However, the Two-Way interaction (Age × Vision) showed marginal significance [ F (5, 320) = 2.18; p = 0.066; η 2 P = 0.03].

Critically, when both components were entered simultaneously in the full sample, the unique prospective effect of psychological investment on body dissatisfaction reached marginal significance from T2 to T3 ( β = 0.08, p = 0.066), whereas behavioral engagement showed no significant unique effect at either interval (T1 → T2: β = −0.05, p = 0.30; T2 → T3: β = −0.06, p = 0.15).

Disease-specific survival in pCR group was shown to be superior to that of non-pCR group with marginal significance (mean, 56.3 months vs. 41.9 months, P = 0.066), Figure 2 B.

The association, while shrinking to a marginal significance of p = 0.066 in the final model, retained its direction in the adjusted analysis.

The total disease extent and coarseness reticulation were increased before administering immunosuppressants (each p < 0.05), and the coarseness scores were increased even after treatment, compared to those before treatment, with marginal significance ( p = 0.066).

The relationship between the interaction SPS × EI and disengagement reached marginal significance (p = 0.066).

The sex-stratified analyses on coworker support were also conducted since the interaction of sex and coworker support had shown marginal significance (p=0.066).

GMNN gene amplification also showed marginal significance with the age of clinical onset of HCC ( P = 0.0663; Figure 8 ) and tumor size ( P = 0.0899; data not shown).