Barely Significant
← all phrases

marginal significance

3,114 sentences · 3,114 papers · 6,631 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.07

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginal significancep = 0.0641.3× alphagold
Second, in an additional regression model to predict initial C p by using both MVPSS of the hypothalamus and the last C p of the previous trial, we found that MVPSS of the hypothalamus significantly predicted the initial C p (beta = 0.17, t = 3.38, p = 0.0007) after regressing out the effect of the last C p of the previous trial, which affected initial C p negatively with marginal significance (beta = −0.03, t = −1.85, p = 0.064).
marginal significanceP =0.0641.3× alphagold
These include delayed surgical intervention,[ 26 , 27 ] advanced age, the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, cognitive function, function or mobility before hip fracture, and number of pre-existing medical conditions.[ 11 , 13 , 28 ] Although we could not find a statistical significance between two groups, there was a marginal significance in one-year mortality between SCH group and control group in this study ( P =0.064).
marginal significanceP = .0641.3× alphagold
In regard to Vocalization during the NI phases, however, there was only marginal significance between the occurrence rate at age 9 months and the responsiveness score at age 18 months (the estimate of standardized regression weight was −.18, P = .064); instead the path between ages 4 and 9 months (the occurrence rates) was significant and the estimate of standardized regression weight was .23 ( P = .023).
marginal significancep = 0.06441.3× alphagold
Only haplotype A - G - C of rs12461727, rs73038469, and rs4803406 in LD block B2 in CYP2A7P1 and CYP2B7P1 showed a dose-response pattern and had a p value near a marginal significance level (raw p = 0.0644).
marginal significancep = 0.0651.3× alphagold
In fact, a one-way RM ANOVA with Greenhouse-Geisser correction revealed a significant difference for AI within prism distortions (F (1.86, 20.45) = 5.091, p = 0.018; η 2 p = 0.316; 1-β = 0.74, n = 14 to achieve 1-β = 0.8; post hoc NK test: 0° vs 15°, p = 0.004, and 5° vs 15°, p = 0.024) and only a marginal significance for MT within prism distorsions (F (2.19, 24.06) = 2.987, p = 0.065; η 2 p = 0.214; 1-β = 0.55, n = 19 to achieve 1-β = 0.8, post hoc NK test: 0° vs 15°, p = 0.05).
marginal significancep = 0.0651.3× alphagold
Conner’s Teacher rating Scale (CTRS) showed a significant reduction in inattention compared to the beginning ( p = 0.07) and compared to the placebo ( p = 0.049), and the score for hyperactivity of Conner’s Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) decreased with a marginal significance compared to the placebo after 1 month of treatment with Pycnogenol ® ( p = 0.065).
marginal significanceP =0.0651.3× alphagold
Comparable values for TMTV, baseline IPI components, IPI category, and COO were observed between groups with high and low intratumoral CD4 + cell burden, except for a lower prevalence of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) score ≥2 with marginal significance (14.5% vs. 27.4%, P =0.065) in those with low intratumoral CD4 + cells.
marginal significanceP = 0.0651.3× alphagold
For the SLCO1B1 521T > C genotypes, in male patients, the risk of enalapril-induced cough in SLCO1B1 521C allele carriers was higher compared with TT genotype carriers, with marginal significance (OR = 2.06, 95%CI = 0.92–4.62 , P = 0.065), while female patients were still strongly associated with SLCO1B1 521T > C genotypes distribution (OR = 2.04, 95%CI = 1.16–3.60, P = 0.012).