“marginal significance”

The mediation model for DASS-Depression yielded less-convincing results, with direct effects demonstrating marginal significance for sperm concentration categories ( p = 0.05) and no significant effects for the treatment duration ( p = 0.123).

We found 176 protein-SMF pairings with marginal significance ( p < 0.05).

Additionally, certain indicators exhibited marginal significance differences (0.1 > p > 0.05), such as DriSucc% in the elite group and GCA, ShortCmp, Def 3rd, Mid 3rd and DriMis in the control group.

Additionally, the two-way interaction between the Trial type and TW showed a marginal significance ( F = 2.01, P = 0.050).

In particular, Cu was the only mineral that exhibited a marginal significance (0.01 < p < 0.05) in relation to the plant part and LxP variation, with no significant result observed for harvest location.

The rater-approved ChatGPT REC ratio showed significant differences ( p < 0.05) across the three cancer types, and the NCCN-aligned ChatGPT REC ratio also exhibited marginal significance ( p = 0.050).

It also chose peripheral vascular disease for univariate logistic analysis as it had marginal significance (P=0.050).

Differences in Moral Decision‐Making Across Age and Conditions Chi‐square tests showed that adolescents had no preference in individual condition ( χ 2 (1) = 0.76, p = 0.383) and tended to choose “action” in the group condition over “no action” with marginal significance ( χ 2 (1) = 3.86, p = 0.050, Table 4 ).

However, there were higher variations in host and viral sequence contamination detected in FL samples, with marginal significance ( p = 0.05, Levene’s test of homogeneity of variance).

The gender gap in reaction time exhibited marginal significance, indicating that males acted more promptly in engaging in heroic actions ( F (1,91) = 3.958, P = 0.050, η p 2 = 0.042; Fig. 1 E ).

The number of RBPMS+ cells was lower in the high-pressure group compared to the control group with marginal significance (p = 0.050), whereas the number of RBPMS+ showed no significant differences in the low-pressure group compared with the control group (p = 0.500) (Fig. 1 D).

First, axial elongation varied significantly with the axis orientation of astigmatism in the combined cohort ( P < 0.001, η 2 = 0.037) and the younger cohort ( P = 0.031, η 2 = 0.024), demonstrating a marginal significance in the older cohort ( P = 0.050, η 2 = 0.043).

The association between having training in old age psychiatry and using a validated scale for assessing the risk of falls was also positive but less pronounced, with marginal significance (Rs = 0.171; p < 0.05).

Both of them showed marginal significance ( p = 0.05), which may be related to the fluency state being a higher psychological state of competitive sports psychology, and it may also be related to the level of athletes’ trait mindfulness and the time effect of mindfulness training.

The CD25 MFI on the Teff cells decreased slightly with marginal significance in the antibody group ( p < 0.05) and increased more than fourfold in the complex group ( p < 0.0001) compared to the control group (Fig. 4 d).

Age also reached a marginal significance in the comparison between participants declaring recent (last year) group sex (35.9 ± 7.6) and those who did not so (40.1 ± 10.9, p = 0.05).

Several other associations reached marginal significance ( p > 0.05, p < 0.10).

After the removal of associations with P-HEIDI <0.01, a total of 247 CpG sites near 115 unique genes passed the marginal significance (P < 0.05) ( Table S2 ).

No significance in BMI was observed between the two interventions overall and in individual follow-up periods, except for a marginal significance (p = 0.05) favoring RYGB in the two to three-year interval.

In the case of Interpersonal Skills, there was a marginal significance when equal variances were assumed [ t (199) = 1.972, p = 0.050], with a mean difference of 0.840 (95% CI: 0.000–1.680).

Direct association of FOXP3 + TILs with VSA t2 was noted (marginal significance p = 0.05; Fig. 4 e).

The correlation of the auxiliary variables with the solid phase gives similar results; the only correlation that we found with marginal significance ( p = 0.05) was in the case of insemination ( r = 0.47).

However, Faith’s PD was higher in the larger space, showing marginal significance (8.6 ± 2.5 vs. 11.6 ± 4.0, p = 0.05, Figure 2 D).

The difference in trifecta achievement rates between the two groups showed marginal significance (p = 0.05).

A modest to moderate correlation with marginal significance (Cramér’s V = 0.23, 95 % CI [0.04, 0.40], p = 0.05) was observed between Shigella species and admission type.