“marginally significant”

The average 13% decrease in the SRHT-only sample for intervention participants compared to control participants was marginally significant with a medium to large effect size (p = .063, d = .74).

Additionally, a marginally significant difference was observed for WASO between the two devices ( p = 0.063). 3.3.

This increase was statistically significant in the overall sample (coefficient = 0.600, p = 0.003) and marginally significant in the KMC sample (coefficient = 0.616, p = 0.063).

There was a marginally significant main effect for prior research experience ( F (1, 63) = 3.583, p = 0.063), a nonsignificant main effect for year in school ( F (1, 63) = 0.525, p = 0.594), and no significant interaction between the effects of research experience and year in school ( F (2, 63) = 0.229, p = 0.796).

In our sampled population, our female participants had marginally significant higher sensitivity than men in detecting happy faces ( p = .063), but not in angry or yawning faces.

The ANOVA yielded a significant fixed effect of Age (F(1,118) = 17,541, p < .0001, partial ŋ 2 = 0.411 due to longer overall looking times in 4-month-olds than in 8-month-olds, a significant interaction between Order and Age (F(1,118) = 5.194, p = .025, partial ŋ 2 = .042), and a marginally significant interaction between Order, Age, and Type of AV information (F(1,118) = 3.514, p = .063, partial ŋ 2 = .029).

After normalizing IgG glycopeptides from plasma to their respective protein amounts, H4N4F1S1-IgG1 ( r = 0.37, p = 0.0047, significant) and H5N4F1S1-IgG1 ( r = 0.25, p = 0.063, marginally significant) were the two glycopeptides that still had positive correlations with eGFRs.

Results showed that decomposability of DOC was significantly related to R h across the forests in the warm season ( P = 0.003), and marginally significant in the cool season ( P = 0.063, Fig. 5 ).

It showed that the three-way interaction was marginally significant ( F 1 , 50 = 3.62, p = 0.063, partial η 2 = 0.068).

The interaction between affective content and velocity was marginally significant, F (1.60, 52.93) = 3.11, p = 0.063, ε = 0.80, η p 2 = 0.09.

There was a marginally significant main effect of group relationship [ F (1,62) = 3.58, p = 0.063, η p 2 = 0.055].

In addition, in all five datasets (all 81 organisms, eukaryotes, animals, and Viridiplantae), the correlation between the number of cell types and the number of protein families remained significant or marginally significant after controlling for genome size (all 81 organisms: ρ = 0.209, P = 0.063; eukaryotes: ρ = 0.434, P = 0.0006; animals: ρ = 0.337, P = 0.100; Viridiplantae: ρ = 0.675, P = 0.011), the number of genes (all 81 organisms: ρ = 0.541, P = 2.19 × 10 −7 ; eukaryotes: ρ = 0.681, P = 2.99 × 10 −9 ; animals:

Looking at descriptive results, establishing a green office was associated with lower pre-questionnaire self-efficacy ( M established = 5.07, M not_established = 5.24), higher collective efficacy ( M established = 5.47, M not_established = 5.31), lower participatory efficacy ( M established = 4.54, M not_established = 4.88), and more volunteer time ( M established = 5.85, M not_established = 4.13) that also emerged as marginally significant predictor ( p = 0.063).

On multivariate analysis, a total dose ≥63 Gy, a single site of metastatic disease, and undergoing ≥4 cycles of chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors for better OS ( P = 0.007, P = 0.014, and P = 0.038, respectively); radiotherapy involving metastatic sites was a marginally significant prognostic factor ( P = 0.063).

After adding perceived organizational support to the regression analysis, the prediction effect was marginally significant ( β = −0.16, p = 0.063 in Model 2; β = −0.14, p = 0.088 in Model 3).

In LUM condition, one-tailed one-sample t -test showed that the accuracies were significantly above chance (25%) when the classifiers were trained on the neural responses to LSF scenes in PPA and OPA (PPA: t (26) = 3.940, p < 0.001; OPA: t (26) = 1.981, p = 0.029), and marginally significant in RSC ( t (24) = 1.584, p = 0.063).

Period and microhabitat had non significant effects on the GLMM ( p > 0.4), but the interaction term was marginally significant ( p = 0.063; Table 2 ). 3.4 Seed dispersal effectiveness Seed dispersal effectiveness provided by different bird groups (residents, and sub‐Saharan and European migrants) changed remarkably in time due to temporal changes in the quantity and quality components (Figure 4 a).

Emotional support of mothers was also found to be marginally significant (OR=2.25, p value=0.063) and those with a lack of emotional support were at greater odds of developing symptoms of depression.

We found a marginally significant Group × Night interaction for the number of nocturnal awakenings ( F (2,64) = 2.894, p = 0.063, η p 2 = 0.083) with decreasing awakenings in the NM group and increasing awakenings in the HC group.

There was a marginally significant association between adequate knowledge and centers with increased HIV testing rates (OR 1.51; CI 95% 0.98–2.34; p = 0.063), as well as a statistically significant association between a strong knowledge base and centers with greater new HIV diagnosis rates (OR 1.61; CI 95% 1.04–2.49; p = 0.032).

The set of independent samples t -tests revealed no difference between the two groups in the calm crowd condition [ t (28) = 0.81; p = 0.43; low anxiety: M = 0.83, SD = 0.93; high anxiety: M = 1.04, SD = 0.49]; instead, in the pressing crowd condition a marginally significant difference between the two groups emerged [ t (28) = 1.59; p = 0.063; d = 0.58; low anxiety: M = 1.14, SD = 0.86; high anxiety: M = 0.73, SD = 0.51].

However, patients with a higher initial degree of LD tended to show improvement in LD after completion of the treatment sessions ( p =0.054), and the relationships between absence of sleep disturbance and AN as well as EL were also marginally significant ( p =0.063 for both comparisons).

All participant types improved their ability to correctly identify both temporary and permanent family planning methods; pre-post change was marginally significant ( p = 0.063) for mothers-in-law’s and husband’s knowledge of temporary methods, and statistically significant for all groups related to permanent methods ( p < 0.05).

Concerning the nodule free amino acid content, drought increased proline content, whereas glutamic acid and asparagine (marginally significant; P =0.063) decreased.

SOMI-1 and SOMI-2 remained marginally significant ( p = 0.063 for both) after correction.