“marginally significant”

Furthermore, a marginally significant time-by-group interaction was observed for physical performance, favoring the multicomponent approach (F(1, 19) = 3.83, p = 0.065, η 2 p = 0.168 [large effect]).

1752) but marginally significant costs (“ p = 0.065”, p. 1752) were reported.

We checked whether this could be explained by manipulation size (β = − 0 .305 ± 0.074, t = −4.122, p < 0.001), with both effects disappearing when including the marginally significant framework × manipulation size interaction in the model ( p = 0.065).

We found a marginally significant main effect of Accent Type, F (1,135) = 3.47, p = .065, η p 2 = .03, suggesting that the differences between children’s ratings of local (Canadian) and non-local teachers tended to be greater when the non-local teachers spoke with a non-native compared with a regional accent.

The OLT showed a marginally significant higher preference for the new location in the SG than NG ( F (1,51) = 3.549, p = 0.065; Figure 2B ).

Univariate analysis indicates that TNM stage, adjuvant chemotherapy, Rab1B and MMP9 proteins are significant predictors for OS and PFS of CRC patients (All P < 0.05, Table 3 ), and Tumor depth is a marginally significant predictor for OS and PFS ( P =0.065 and P =0.059, respectively, Table 3 ).

Estimates of EEG power reflected the group differences in sleep architecture with a significant reduction of slow-oscillation power in the physostigmine group at all three electrode sites (main effect “physostigmine/placebo”: frontal p = 0.021, η p 2 = 0.20; central: p = 0.019, η p 2 = 0.21; parietal: p = 0.025, η p 2 = 0.19) and a marginally significant reduction in delta band power (frontal: p = 0.065, η p 2 = 0.14; central: p = 0.040, η p 2 = 0.16; parietal: p = 0.058, η p 2 = 0.14, see Online Resource 2 ).

Those with commercial insurance had a higher odds of receiving prenatal consultation than those with Medicaid or self-pay and was marginally significant (OR [95%CI] = 4.31 [0.91, 20.36], p = 0.065).

The Code Switch effect (switches are more positive than non-switches) was marginally significant ( p = 0.065) in the absence of a semantic violation and not significant in the presence of one ( p = 0.275).

Sleep disturbances also showed marginally significant differences in expected influence centrality ( p = 0.065, q < 0.10), suggesting that sleep disturbances may have had different net impacts on the overall network functioning between fathers and mothers.

Additionally, the negative interaction effect of psychological demands with PSC was significant for five items (Q2–Q6) ( β = −0.055 to −0.043, p = 0.008 to 0.041) and marginally significant for nervousness (Q1) ( β = −0.039, p = 0.065).

People with dementia ratings showed a marginally significant decline in ‘similarity of views’ F(3, 126) = 2.795, p = .065 and ‘generally getting along’, F (3, 135) = 2.446, p = .080 ( Table 3 ).

For true sentences, we found a marginally significant effect of Modality switch [ F (1, 10) = 4.28, MSE = 20.72, p = 0.065] in the frontal electrodes, where mismatch showed a greater positivity than match (0.929 vs. 0.126 μV, difference 0.803).

The comparison between the BCVAs before and after 1 year among all patients revealed a marginally significant difference (P = 0.065), which may be attributed to the small sample size in our study.

Participants also demonstrated significant or marginally significant reductions in diastolic blood pressure ( P = 0.065) and mood impairment as measured by the POMS (overall, P = 0.07; depression, P = 0.01; anger/hostility, P = 0.09).

An analysis with information structuring revealed similar results: a significant effect for Tool-use , F (1,88) = 52.36, p < 0.01, partial η 2 = 0.373, d = 1.47, with a superiority of the hyperlink condition (hyperlink: M = 243.16, SD = 25.0; annotation: M = 199.99, SD = 33.3), and a marginally significant effect for Setting, F (1,88) = 3.485, p = 0.065, partial η 2 = 0.038, d = 0.32, with higher scores for dyads (dyads: M = 228.16, SD = 38.5; individuals: M = 216.68, SD = 33.9).

Participants over 50 years also demonstrated increased odds of repeat utilization, though this association was marginally significant (AOR: 2.0, 95% CI: 1.0–4.3, p = 0.065).

testaceus ( n = 20) were marginally significant overall ( p = 0.065), but there were no significant differences among treatments.

flexible preferences) ANCOVA controlling for age, income, and previous knowledge of Rivian electric vehicles, we find a marginally significant interaction ( F (1, 284) = 3.43, p = .065).

The model suggests a marginally significant difference in total lesion scores between G2 and G3 at 35 dpi ( p =0.0652), but the evidence is not strong (Supporting Information 3 : Figure S1 and Figure 5 A).

The CPM models based on the negative networks effectively predicted conscientiousness (negative network: r = 0.237, P = 0.0036) ( Figure 3B ) and neuroticism (negative network: r = 0.200, P = 0.0164) ( Figure 4B ), while the models based on the positive networks were marginally significant in predicting conscientiousness (positive network: r = 0.147, P = 0.0652) ( Figure 3A ) and neuroticism (positive network: r = 0.143, P = 0.0656) ( Figure 4A ).

A marginally significant difference was found between those children and adolescents with migraine (47.2%; n = 306) vs. those without (42.1%; n = 273) for unhealthy weight ( p = 0.0652).

The marginally significant contrast effect between 3-year-olds and 6-year-olds ( B = −0.943, SE = 0.422, z = −2.235, p = 0.0654) indicate that 6-year-olds produced marginally more BA responses than their 3-year-old counterparts while the remaining contrasts among 3- and 4-year-olds, and 4- and 6-year-olds were not significant.

Analyses revealed an overall main effect of time (F [5] , [49] = 5.60, p = 0.0004) and a significant interaction (F [5] , [49] = 5.39, p = 0.0005) for the number of pERK cells, and a main effect of time (F [5] , [50] = 11.12, p <0.0001) and a marginally significant interaction (F [5] , [50] = 2.23, p = 0.0654) for pNR1.

For the gene expression data, a 2 (group) × 8 (mRNA) repeated measures ANOVA with multivariate tests showed significant mean differences across mRNAs ( p = 0.0014) and a marginally significant group-by-mRNA interaction ( p = 0.0656).