“marginally statistically significant”

The regression coefficients β 0 = 0.0701 (SE = 0.0152), β 2 = 0.0370 (SE = 0.0065), β 3 = 0.0194 (SE = 0.0056) and β 6 = 0.0008 (SE = 0.0003) were marginally statistically significant at P = 0.05 and R 2 = 0.726.

Marginally statistically significant differences existed in general EBM knowledge scores among the different levels of familiarity with EBM (p = 0.05).

The difference in past 3-month self-testing was statistically significant by arm at 3-month follow-up (p < 0.05) and was marginally statistically significant at 6-month follow up (p ≤ 0.05), but were not statistically significant at 9- and 12-months (Table 4 ).

After adjusting for age, race/ethnicity, gender, occupation, patient contact, and having young children in the household, we observed an increase in the odds of reporting unplanned absenteeism for each score increment in overall burnout scores, but the association was only marginally statistically significant: (OR = 1.02, 95% CI: 1.00–1.03, p = 0.05).

The mean age was 53.8 years in the first group and 57.8 years in the second group (the difference was marginally statistically significant, p=0.05).

The difference in distribution of the overall views was marginally statistically significant between the categories (Kruskal–Wallis test, χ 2 = 7.98, p = 0.05); however, pairwise comparison revealed no significant difference between the categories.

In eight of the 11 questions, a statistically significant difference was recorded at p<0.001 (questions 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 9, and 11), and in the two marginally statistically significant differences, p = 0.05 (questions 4 and 10) were established.

This difference was marginally statistically significant in an independent sample t -test (t(4) = 2.7, p = 0.05).

H/I status remained marginally statistically significant in the adjusted model (OR = 2.15; 95% CI = 1.00 to 4.64; P = .05) after adjusting for all clinicopathological factors examined (age, tumor size, tumor grade, nodal status, ER, PR, HER2) ( Supplementary Table 2 ).

This difference is marginally statistically significant ( P = 0.05).

This difference was marginally statistically significant in 2010–2011 (p = 0.05), but not in 2009–2010 (p = 0.91) or 2011–2012 (p = 0.56).

The increased protein content of the larvae fed the MO diets led to a reduced amount of carbohydrates and more specifically, there was a decrease of 3.44 (no statistically significant at p > 0.05), 5.23 (marginally statistically significant at p ≅ 0.05), and 31.77% (statistically significant at p < 0.05) in samples MO10, MO25, and MO50 compared to sample MO0, respectively.

The analysis indicated that the overall model was marginally statistically significant (F = 2.507, df1 = 2, df2 = 48, p = 0.050) and explained 9.5% of the variance in the number of maternal symptoms (R2 = 0.095).

In vignette C, which incorporated a diagnosis of dementia, we observed statistically significant differences ( p < .01) for all procedures except for communication, which had a marginally statistically significant difference ( p = .050).

When comparing those with and without social support, the difference in positive well-being and attachment scores was marginally statistically significant but with a large effect size, t (59) = −1.99, p = .05, d = 0.51.

4 a) showed an overall decrease for the historical period and both scenarios, being marginally statistically significant (p < 0.05) in the RCP8.5 scenario.

[ 31 ] found that excessive GWG was associated with higher Staphylococcus in colostrum (p = 0.05; marginally statistically significant) and lower Bifidobacterium at 1 month (p = 0.03).

A marginally statistically significant difference was observed between the two groups for the third case ( p = 0.05).

There was a marginally statistically significant difference in reported race among patients with SIS in the PRE versus POST periods ( p = 0.05).

24 There was no correlation between serum AA levels and HAM-D scores in depressed patients 25 while rather weak (rho = −0.230) and marginally statistically significant ( P = .050, Spearman’s rank test) correlation of HAM-D scores with plasma levels of AA (but not Kyn, 3HK, KYNA, and XA) were reported in medicated MDD patients before ECT treatment. 26 AA formation from Kyn is catalyzed by Kynase .

For jet speed, the models show a marginally statistically significant ( P = 0.05) positive trend in multimodel mean jet speed (0.026 m s −1 decade −1 ), but this is about 20 times weaker than the observed trend from ERA5.

However, this difference was marginally statistically significant only for ETR rates (cirrhotics: 87% versus noncirrhotics: 97%, P = 0.05). 3.2.

The difference between subgroups was marginally statistically significant (Chi2=3.84, df=1, P = 0.05, I2=73.9%).

Regression analysis of the scales used Table 3 demonstrates a linear regression analysis showing a marginally statistically significant association between tobacco consumption and anxiety levels (p = 0.05) and statistically significant predictability between GAD-7 scores and CES-D scores.

The type of vascular access (AVF or other types) is also marginally statistically significant (P = 0.05).