We found that officials who estimated lower learning levels were more likely to prioritize foundational literacy, although this relationship was only marginally statistically significant.
← all phrases
“marginally statistically significant”
Sighted at
p=0.08
In the literature
Patients undergoing radiation (OR = 1.94, 95% CI 1.36–2.79) and surgery (OR = 1.76, 95% CI 0.99–3.14) were more likely to be recommended or prescribed ET, although surgery was only marginally statistically significant.
A marginally statistically significant difference was also observed in the percentage of tumour volume reduction and RECIST response rate.
Older caregivers had a higher loneliness score compared to non-caregivers; however, the difference was only marginally statistically significant at the 10% level.
The prevalence of MYC rearrangement was higher in the White group (19.38%) than in the non-White group (14.16%), but this difference was only marginally statistically significant (0.05 < p = 0.098 < 0.10 threshold).
The gestational age, weight, and feeding status prior to procedural closure of the PDA are marginally statistically significant.
54 The developer reasoned that since the DMI difference between the Spanish‐speaking group and the English‐speaking group was marginally statistically significant, it was acceptable to use the English norms of the Spanish‐speaking cohort.
Additional indicators were marginally statistically significant or were statistically significant in the crude or basic-adjusted models, and these results are available in the data tables.
Results The linear mixed model analysis of variance, based on the Aligned Rank Transform, indicated only one marginally statistically significant effect of group on Relevance to outgroup factor ( Table 3 ).
Specifically, the PanelMatch models become insignificant for most robustness specifications” Corrected text: “We find consistent negative effects for the TWFE models, although one of them is only marginally statistically significant.
The association was marginally statistically significant for NfL ( p ‐trend=0.05).
In contrast, the differences observed in food purchases driven by security needs are only marginally statistically significant.
As mentioned above, higher psychosocial burden and poorer HRQoL were observed in boys and young men; however, in another studygirls showed clinically worse HRQoL than boys (mean difference 0.71), although this difference was only marginally statistically significant.
Although this effect was only marginally statistically significant, it implies potential benefits of the intervention.
Although we found only a few significantly or marginally statistically significant peptides expressed in AD and AD within DM in muscle and serum, our results from exploring the p ‐value distribution support an enrichment in low p ‐values for AD in muscle and AD within DM in serum.
The other 4 studies found that the increase in the risk of “too small for gestational age” was marginally statistically significant at high levels of exposure to chloroform.
Associations were weaker and were marginally statistically significant for some tests with lower hearing demands, though symbol cancellation stood out as an exception ( Supplementary Figure 2 —see online supplementary material ).
On the other hand, in the DTI group, the size of the ADM was marginally statistically significant in reducing the risk of CC.
The raw differences in math are all at least marginally statistically significant.
7 Our research suggests that only two variables were marginally statistically significant moderators.
On the contrary, a marginally statistically significant association was observed between SARS-CoV-2 at a 1-week lag and ILI rate in the 15+ age group. 4.
Age at menarche (aHR: 0.99, 95% CI 0.98–1.00) and age at menopause (aHR: 1.00, 95% CI 0.99–1.00) were found to have a marginally statistically significant association with stroke.
The estimate for AB2 (with p -value 0.205) was marginally statistically significant and had a small positive (nominal) relationship with CA as reflected in the estimated value of 0.432.
The prediction was only marginally statistically significant in the sex-adjusted model.
Although only marginally statistically significant, anxiety was in greater percentage in control versus RUNs.