“moderately significant”

In the case of the CD8 + CCR7 + CD45RA − (CM) population, only a moderately significant increase was detected in the Ehrlichia group with respect to the control.

This latter result was also supported by a moderately significant domain hit identified in C. monodonta , i.e. pfam02326 or Mt_ATP-synt_B, a superfamily that corresponds to the subunit 8 of the F0 complex of plants (E-value 4e-03).

Consistent with these changes in ABA accumulation, the expression of the ABA-responsive gene ATAO3 was significantly enhanced in OE-ERF013 plants, while WT-T plants showed only a moderately significant increase compared with CK ( Figure 5 B).

The Cohen’s d value above 0.8 is very significant, 0.5 to 0.8 is moderately significant, and from 0.2 to 0.5 is mildly significant.

Additionally, serotype-specific PET values showed a moderately significant positive correlation with the corresponding GMTs (Supplementary Fig. 2 ), indicating that KD-382-induced neutralizing activity predominates over enhancing activity.

Similarly, expert opinions were evaluated with the Kendall Coefficient of Concordance Correlation Test method, which found that there was a moderately significant agreement among experts [ 23 , 24 ].

Days to emergence showed negative and weak association with dry pod weight (r = − 0.19), dry seed weight (r = − 0.12), and yield (r = − 0.19) while positive and moderately significant correlation was found with harvest index (r = 0.16), days to maturity ( r = 0.40), and days to 50% flowering (r = 0.58).

When compared to the cells exposed to glucose, cells without glucose had moderately significant higher CHG accumulated within the clinical strain cells.

Moderately significant positive correlations were also noted for PAS and TCI subscale scores and scores for novelty seeking, harm avoidance, and self-transcendence.

Regarding the correlation between the pain intensity and the quality of life, there was a moderately significant relationship between the patients’ mental health and their vitality.

Dental anxiety showed moderately significant correlations with the SPS subscale Ease of Excitation (EOE), which measures emotional reactivity to physiological stimuli.

Therefore, Fisher z-transformation was performed to allow a one-sided, right-handed t -test to be applied in order to test for significance; p -values < 0.01 and <0.05 were regarded as highly and moderately significant, respectively.

A p ‐value of < 0.01 indicated a moderately significant statistical difference, denoted as “ ** ”.

Comparisons between control and treated samples were carried out with Student’s t -test, with p -values < 0.05 as significant (*), < 0.01 as moderately significant (**), and < 0.001 as highly significant (***).

Meanwhile, the Δ was moderately significant for E. camaldulensis and C. bergamia (2.94%), and not quite significant for S. lycopersicum (leaf), which worsened its performance, with a −3.17%.

Total burden score and patient provided with assistance were highly significantly correlated, patient needs help and caregiver stress were moderately significant (Table 3 ).

We found a moderately significant relationship between SVL expression and floral abundance (catkin coverage in tree crown; see “Methods” section, Fig. 2 ) (Pr < 0.0219) (Fig. 4B ).

The model created according to this value was moderately significant.

In those cases where there were differences between the relationships in HER2+ and HER2−, the p values were only ever moderately significant.

For example, if a map has one large cluster with moderately significant statistics, and another small cluster with very significant statistics, then using a low-significance threshold makes the first cluster survive but not the second, whereas a high-significance threshold has the opposite effect.

There is only moderately significant correlation between baseline and development throughout the IOM.

The Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient was 0.63 (p<0.01), indicating a moderately significant correlation.

Moderately significant difference was found in life satisfaction by survey year in bivariate analysis with no clear time trend (survey 1: 7.83 ± 1.50; survey 2: 7.98 ± 1.57; survey 3: 7.95 ± 1.60; survey 4: 7.90 ± 1.53) ( p = 0.025).

26 We hypothesized a moderately significant negative correlation.

Therefore, the results obtained are moderately significant and can be used in further studies.