Barely Significant
← all phrases

near significance

128 sentences · 128 papers · 872 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.07

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

near significancep < .102.0× alphagold
- We can speak of a near significance (p < .10) with a moderate effect (R 2 = 0.052) in the absolute preference of the least attractive woman, where the results point to a greater preference for the protrusive profile among those who use the nets little/not at all (50%) and towards the retrusive profile among those who use them medium/
near significancep = 0.12.0× alphagold
In South Africa, significant associations included having more friends, which was negatively associated with ART adherence, as well as near significance ( p = 0.1) for negative associations with betweenness centrality and also for the number of same-gender network members.
near significancep < 0.12.0× alphagold
In addition, logistic regressions models were adjusted, separately for postmenopausal women and men, with VFS (percentile 20) as dependent variable and with categorical variables that reached significance ( p < 0.05) or near significance ( p < 0.1) at the bivariate analysis as independent factors.
near significanceP < 0.12.0× alphagold
Comparative analysis of categorical variables was performed using Fisher’s exact test or a χ2-test with Yates’ correction, and continuous variables through the Mann–Whitney U -test with statistical significance (P < 0.05) or near significance (P < 0.1) were subjected to multivariate analysis using a forward stepwise logistic regression model.
near significanceP = 0.10932.2× alphagold
Further comparisons between the groups indicated that the difference in the malformation rate between the young and old groups stored for the short time was near significance (10.5% vs.19.5%, respectively, P = 0.1093), whereas the difference between the young and old groups following long storage was highly significant (13.7% vs. 33.9%, respectively, p= 0.0075).
These results indicate a higher chance of survival for patients with low iASPP expression, which is independent of the ELN risk group (high statistical significance in low and intermediate risk, near significance in high risk cohorts with regard to OS and EFS, compare Fig. 3H (median OS and EFS rates are provided in Fig. 3I ; 1- and 2-year OS rates are listed in Table 1 ).
In the fully adjusted Model 5, caregiver-reported societal cultural stress was the only stressor independently associated with a higher hazard of lifetime BD onset (HR, 2.15; 95% CI, 1.18–3.89), while the effect of marijuana use was near significance (HR, 1.90, 95% CI, 1.00–3.63, p, 0.051).