Barely Significant
← all phrases

near-significant

1,651 sentences · 1,651 papers · 5,323 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Listed by Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

near-significantp = 0.081.6× alphagold
NoGo commission errors were somewhat directly related to NoGo P3b (ρ = 0.39, p = 0.09, CI = [−0.08, 0.72]) and showed a significant inverse association with Go P3b (ρ = −0.54, p = 0.01, CI = [−0.80, −0.09]) and near-significant direct associations with the negativity in Go Na (ρ = −0.40, p = 0.08, CI = [−0.73, 0.07]) and Go N2c (ρ = −0.44, p = 0.05, CI = [−0.75, 0.03]).
near-significantP < .081.6× alphagold
There were 3 survey questions that showed near-significant findings, with females reporting lower scores than males: nurse courtesy and respect (96.05 vs 93.78, P < .08), medical education for discharge (88.89 vs 84.87, P < .06), and would you recommend the hospital (96.33 vs 93.78, P < .07).
near-significantP = 0.081.6× alphagold
In support of this possibility it is worth noting that even after filtering out 25% of their patient data (66 out of 262), their reported effect remained near-significant ( P = 0.08 – ANOVA interaction), and in fact, would be significant if a single-tailed test were applied, an approach that would be justified on the basis of previous published data.
Visual surround suppression in schizophrenia.
Front Psychol · 2013 · PMC3584288
near-significantP = 0·081.6× alphagold
( 7 ) also reported a near-significant reduction in HDL-C ( P = 0·08) and no effect on TAG, in our analyses, which are based on a total of eighteen publications and twenty-seven strata, the intake of almonds was associated with significant reductions in TC, LDL-C and TAG, and no effects on HDL-C.
near-significantP = 0.081.6× alphagold
Whereas in unstimulated control DCs there was a significant negative correlation between CD86 expression and FD uptake ( r = -0.76, P = 0.03) and there was a near-significant negative correlation with MR expression ( r = -0.46, P = 0.08), this was not found in unstimulated lupus DCs ( r = -0.23, P = 0.33 for FD uptake; r = -0.33, P = 0.46 for MR expression).
near-significantp <.081.6× alphagold
In the SEM analysis of the cross-sectional data, we searched for models with: the causality indicated by the longitudinal analyses in Tables S12 and S13 ; higher numbers of exclusively significant ( p <.05) or near-significant (.05< p <.08) parameters; and optimal model fit (root mean square error of approximation, RMSEA) and AIC statistics.