Barely Significant
← all phrases

near-significant

1,651 sentences · 1,651 papers · 5,323 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Listed by Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

near-significantp = 0.081.6× alphagold
NoGo commission errors were somewhat directly related to NoGo P3b (ρ = 0.39, p = 0.09, CI = [−0.08, 0.72]) and showed a significant inverse association with Go P3b (ρ = −0.54, p = 0.01, CI = [−0.80, −0.09]) and near-significant direct associations with the negativity in Go Na (ρ = −0.40, p = 0.08, CI = [−0.73, 0.07]) and Go N2c (ρ = −0.44, p = 0.05, CI = [−0.75, 0.03]).
near-significantP = 0·081.6× alphagold
( 7 ) also reported a near-significant reduction in HDL-C ( P = 0·08) and no effect on TAG, in our analyses, which are based on a total of eighteen publications and twenty-seven strata, the intake of almonds was associated with significant reductions in TC, LDL-C and TAG, and no effects on HDL-C.
near-significantP = 0.081.6× alphagold
Whereas in unstimulated control DCs there was a significant negative correlation between CD86 expression and FD uptake ( r = -0.76, P = 0.03) and there was a near-significant negative correlation with MR expression ( r = -0.46, P = 0.08), this was not found in unstimulated lupus DCs ( r = -0.23, P = 0.33 for FD uptake; r = -0.33, P = 0.46 for MR expression).
near-significantp = 0.0811.6× alphagold
The repeated-measures ANOVA indicated that the effect of time was not statistically significant (Wilks’ λ = 0.998, F (1,166) = 0.338, p = 0.562, η p 2 = 0.002); nevertheless, a significant effect of the time × group interaction emerged (Wilks’ λ = 0.946, F (1,166) = 9.459, p = 0.002, η p 2 = 0.05): there was a significant difference over time (i.e., increasing) for the experimental group (Wilks’ λ = 0.929, F (1,104) = 7.922, p = 0.006, η p 2 = 0.07) and a near-significant difference over time (i.e., decreasing) for the control group (Wilks’ λ = 0.952, F (1,62) = 3.152, p = 0.081, η p 2 = 0.05).
near-significantp = 0.0811.6× alphagold
Further evidence for a memory enhancement from pre-encoding ayahuasca came from a near-significant reduction in high-confidence unrelated lure false alarm rates (CI = [−0.00 to 0.04], t (23) = 1.82, p = 0.081, d = 0.37; Figure 1(b) ), though these were near floor.
near-significantP = .0821.6× alphagold
Our exploratory analysis revealed a near-significant inverse correlation between BMI and SC infliximab trough levels ( P = .082), and a stepwise decrease in median trough levels across BMI categories was observed: 29.0 (20.0, 45.0) mcg/mL in normal weight patients, 23.0 (10.4, 40.0) mcg/mL in overweight patients, and 20.0 (12.0, 39.0) mcg/mL in obese patients, though this did not reach statistical significance.
near-significantp = 0.0821.6× alphagold
In MCF-7 cells, increasing DPP under matched ADR conditions consistently reduced clonogenic survival, with the strongest effect at 10 Gy, where survival decreased from 0.0880 to 0.0325 ( p = 0.082, near-significant), while differences at 5 and 20 Gy were non-significant ( p = 0.197 and 0.136, respectively).
near-significantp=.08261.7× alphagold
Natalizumab-treated pwMS showed a near-significant reduction in CD4+ AIM+ cells at 5–6 months post-vaccination compared to the previous time point (p=.0826) but, following booster dose, the increased proportion of these cells was comparable to that seen following the initial vaccination (p=.0378) ( Figure 4D ).
near-significantp = 0.0831.7× alphagold
A general linear model on the latencies to touch NP, M and NN cones, with chimp, valence (continuous) and their interaction as predictors and speed as a continuous covariate, showed that these latencies differed between chimpanzees (effect of chimp: F (2, 116) = 15.52, p < 0.001); there was also a near-significant interaction between chimpanzee and valence (interaction of chimp × valence: F (2, 116) = 2.54, p = 0.083).