“near-significant”

The post hoc testing of the main effect of ACoA status demonstrated a near-significant difference between the control participants and the hazardous ACoA group (mean difference = 2.568, q(125) = 2.994, p = 0.094).

Among LI participants, and consistent with previous reports, 32 , 34 near-misses evoked significant or near-significant positive BOLD responses within the ventral striatum (t(23)=1.7438, P =0.0945), putamen (t(23)=2.0959, P =0.0473) and amygdala (t(23)=2.89, P =0.0083) (see Figure 3 ).

Temperature and humidity interacted as near-significant predictors of harmful response behaviour ( X 2 = 2.790, p = 0.095; individually temperature X 2 = 5.595, p = 0.018; humidity X 2 = 4.913, p = 0.027); there was a weak non-significant positive correlation between temperature and response ( t = 1.214, d.f. = 383, p = 0.226, r = 0.062) and a non-significant weak negative correlation between humidity and response ( t = −0.946, d.f. = 383, p = 0.345, r = −0.050).

Progression-Free Survival and Workflow Variables: The progression-free survival (PFS) patterns paralleled those observed for OS: median PFS was not reached in patients without pre-biopsy corticosteroid exposure, whereas patients who received steroids had a median PFS of 10.5 months, with a near-significant difference observed in log-rank testing ( p = 0.095).

These values were significantly higher than those at the 30 min time point ( p < 0.01), and linalyl acetate in the 10% group showed a near-significant difference compared to the 5% group at 60 min ( p = 0.095).

The overall AEFIs reporting rate did not increase significantly after the adjustment (RR = 0.95, 95%CI : 0.83–1.08, P = .442), but notable dose-specific heterogeneity was observed: a near-significant increase for the first dose (RR = 1.67, P = .096), significant decreases for the second and third doses (RR = 0.70 and 0.40, respectively), and a substantially higher rate for the newly added fifth dose (684.84 per 100,000 doses).

While opioid use demonstrated a near-significant interaction effect ( P = 0.097), further research is needed to clarify its role.

Chao1 (83.75–478.96) and Shannon (1.24–6.15) indices showed near-significant differences (Kruskal–Wallis, Chao1: p = 0.097; Shannon: p = 0.051), suggesting interactive effects of season, region, and root type.

With M WT mice, 0.75 Gy GCRsim caused a near-significant reduction in levels of IL-10 compared to 0.5 Gy and sham-irradiated mice ( Figure 8 I, p = 0.0976, p = 0.0508, respectively), whereas levels were more consistent across doses of gamma ( Figure 8 J).

We also found a near-significant negative trend between aggressiveness in the wild (simulated conspecific intrusions) and HRS when analyzing both species together ( n = 20, r = − 0.4, p = 0.098) (Fig.

Exposure to Pb 2+ also resulted in a near-significant reduction in the number of vesicles in the RRP/docked vesicles in Perforant Path terminals ( p = 0.0989; Table 1 , IA) .

Of the four emotion themes, we found a near-significant effect of moving/bittersweet on pain unpleasantness ratings [MD = −3.61, t (482) = −1.65, p = 0.099].

The same protein displayed near-significant ( p = 0.099) enrichment in the Olfm4-H subset in healthy individuals.

As a supplement, the kappa index showed near-significant decrease from the wakefulness to the postprandial somnolence ( Figure S4 A, p = 0.0991, Cohen’s d = 0.1903).

Only three bivariate linear models yielded near-significant ( p < 0.10) relationships with number of trees, and these models still yielded significance with these predictors: mean distance to nearest town ( p = 0.006; R 2 = 0.523), distance to nearest trail ( p = 0.014; R 2 = 0.476), and mean wind speed ( p = 0.006; R 2 = 0.517).

All groups experienced improved symptoms over time, with the L and SL groups showing near-significant improvement by Year 3 (p < 0.1).

Overall, 14 variables had significant or near-significant association ( p ≤ 0.1) with low resilience ( Table 2 ).

Significant ( P < 0.05) and near-significant results ( P < 0.10) are presented in Table 4 (see also Additional file 2 ).

Significant or near-significant variables ( p < 0.1) in the bivariate analysis were added using the introduction method and those whose results were not significant in the model were discarded.

(2005) openness measure ( p = 0.03) and a near-significant predictor of the McCrae (2002) openness measure ( p = 0.10).

Significant (p < 0.05) or near-significant (p ≤ 0.1) interactions were followed by pairwise comparisons.

Notable near-significant differences (0.05 < p < 0.1) are indicated in the figures.

Notably, other features such as number of branches and number of slab voxels had near-significant increases in the sham group (0.05 < p < 0.1). 2.3.

Significant differences were declared at P ≤ 0.05 whereas near-significant trends were considered at 0.05 < P ≤ 0.10.

In order to streamline the model and focus on the most meaningful relationships, only significant and near-significant (i.e., 0.05 < p < 0.10) effects from Model 1 in Model 2 were retained (see Figure 2 ).