“nominally significant”

In the skull EEG, there was an insignificant decrease in ITC at 40 Hz (t (10) =2.108, P =.061) and a nominally significant increase in ITC at 20-Hz stimulation (t (10) =2.237, P =.049).

UPPS‐Lack of Premeditation with an optimal cut‐off of >8 was nominally significant ( P = 0.049), but was associated with exceedingly low sensitivity and NPV (0.24, 0.52, respectively) and classified AUD status with only 56% accuracy.

increased exon inclusion) in heat call-treated embryos, with the enrichment analysis showing a nominally significant difference (proportion of gains=0.24, P =0.049, q =0.34; total exon skipping events=17) ( Table S5 ).

A nominally significant association of DCTN1 PDVs with PD was found in the EoPD & FPD cohort (20 vs. 7, p = 0.049), which did not remain significant after correction (FDR p * = 0.098).

The only nominally significant between‐group difference was for FNAE ( p = .049), but this was in the opposite direction to that expected under a simple dosage‐effect expectation, with greater improvement observed in the lower‐engagement group.

In the multiple regression model with each predictor adjusted for the others, the only nominally significant association ( P = 0.049) was between the number of researchers per 1 M and number of cases ( Table 1 ).

A nominally significant difference in the direction of the preterm preadolescents outperforming the term preadolescents was detected only on Block Construction (F (1,37) = 4.131, p = 0.049), not surviving correction for multiple comparisons.

We found a nominally significant association for the PGS for LA PEF with an effect direction consistent with that of ischemic stroke (HR per SD increase, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.88–1.00]; P =0.049).

Among 21 candidate variants including genes in the interferon response pathway, APOE , TMPRSS2 , TLR3 , the HLA complex and the ABO blood group, only rs1205, a 3’ untranslated region variant in the CRP gene, showed nominally significant association in T-dominant model analyses (odds ratio 1.859, 95%CI 1.001–3.453, p = 0.049) after adjustment for age, sex, center, body mass index, and a history of cardiovascular disease.

Interaction analysis indicated a nominally significant interaction between αT/(TCH+TG) and sex in relation to TgAb levels ( p = 0.049).

Unadjusted means favored both support groups (control: 5.79; call: 6.57; SMS: 6.80); the prespecified SMS-vs-control contrast was nominally significant ( P =.049, small effect).

1 C); with a nominally significant increase in the non-delirious group (median increase of 11.4%, 95% CI: 0.0%–23.5%, p = 0.0491).

There was a nominally significant association between the s allele of the 5-HTTLPR polymorphism and TEM (odds ratio, 1.434; 95% confidence interval, 1.001–2.055; P = 0.0493; I 2 = 52%).

In uncorrected pairwise comparisons, only the proportion of activated NK cells showed a nominally significant difference between the IDD and control groups (raw P = 0.04949).

Additionally, there was a nonsignificant trend towards multiple repeat mutations (p = 0.5127), as well as, a nominally significant trend towards deletion mutations (p = 0.0495) (Table 6 ).

A nominally significant association with BPD was found for rs1006737 in CACNA1C ( P =0.0498).

Finally, we found significant differences in the frequencies of TAGA ( P = 0.005, OR = 3.187, 95% CI 1.376–7.382) containing rs4570625-rs11178997-rs1386494-rs7305115 between ODD and control groups (Tables 7 , 8 ). However, the further analysis by Haploview revealed the nominally significant finding for rs1386494 ( χ 2 = 3.846, P = 0.0499), and only one haplotypes (TAGA, χ 2 = 4.366, P = 0.0367) remained significant.

For each refitted model, the fixed-effect estimate of the group-by-time interaction was extracted, and summary metrics were computed, including the range and mean of the estimated effects (β), the mean p -value, and the number of iterations in which the effect remained nominally significant ( p < .05).

Of the 1,291 adult BMI variants compared, 395 variants (31%) were nominally significant ( p < 0.05) and 949 (74%) displayed directionally consistent associations with childhood BMI, which was far greater than would be expected by chance ( p < 0.001) ( Table S6 ).

Some nominally significant correlations (uncorrected p < 0.05) were also observed in AN and BN groups (details in the Online Supplementary Material, Tables S1-S3).

In accordance with the findings in mice, a nominally significant ( P <0.05) association between CDKAL1 rs4712523 and BMI was replicated in 2 Japanese general populations comprising 5,695 and 12,569 samples; the risk allele for type 2 diabetes was also associated with decreased BMI.

However, 17 other covariates were nominally significant ( P -value<0.05) for HGF and 4 (weight, sample round, systolic blood pressure and age) remained significant after correction for multiple testing.

Fourteen out of twenty-eight selected SNPs showed nominally significant associations at p <0.05 with different dimension-specific quantitative assessments of psychotic experiences but each failed to meet statistical significance post correction for multiple testing ( p <0.0008; one-tailed).

For any medication with a nominally significant association ( p < .05), the same analysis was repeated in the chemotherapy group to test for nonspecific effects.

To identify metabolomic biomarkers independent of conventional risk factors including DKD, metabolites remaining nominally significant ( p <0.05) after further adjusting for CKD and severely increased albuminuria were assessed for the prognostic value.