Barely Significant
← all phrases

“showed a trend”

53,323 sentences · 53,323 papers · 65,371 search hits before verification

In the literature

showed a trendp = 0.0611.2× alpha
Although the strong inhibitory KIR3DL1/Bw4 combination showed a trend toward reduced relapse incidence in univariate analysis ( Table 3 , p = 0.061), this association was not confirmed in the final multivariate model, consistent with recent reports ( 9 , 10 , 17 ).
showed a trendp = 0.0611.2× alpha
SNPstat analysis revealed that the TT and TC genotypes of rs10757272 showed a significant risk association among female CAD patients (OR = 8.15 for TC and 9.27 for TT, p = 0.012 in the codominant model), CC genotype of rs1333045 showed a significant risk association among all CAD patients (OR = 1.46, p = 0.046 in the recessive model), CC genotype of rs1333049 showed a trend toward risk association among premature (age at presentation < 55 years in males and <65 years in females) CAD patients (OR = 1.61, p = 0.061 in the recessive model), and GG genotype of rs4977574 showed a significant risk association among premature CAD patients (OR = 1.77, p = 0.025 in the recessive model).
showed a trendp = 0.0611.2× alpha
Age at CD diagnosis showed a trend for statistical significance (HR = 1.02, p = 0.061), and after stratification, age at diagnosis ≥ 40 years conferred higher risk (HR = 1.93, p = 0.016), alongside persistent effects of complicated phenotype (HR = 1.83, p = 0.027) and corticosteroid use (HR = 2.01, p = 0.013).
showed a trendP = 0.0611.2× alpha
The CC genotype of rs1333049 (G/C), a highly replicated SNP, showed a trend toward risk association with premature CAD in the study population ( P = 0.061 in the recessive model). 41 , 42 Further, we found that the AA genotype of rs16905599 (G/A) is associated with more than 2.4-fold risk for CAD in the study population ( P = 0.025 in the codominant model and P = 0.0069 in the recessive model).
showed a trendp = 0.0611.2× alpha
At PN day 84, an intravenous GTT was carried out in the cannulated rats, and the results (in Figure 5 A) show that MCT rats are equally as glucose tolerant as CTRL animals, although the MCT group showed a trend towards a lower area under the net glucose curve (iAUC: incremental Area Under the Curve, iAUC; p = 0.061, one tailed) compared to CTRL rats ( Supplementary Table S3 ).