Barely Significant
← all phrases

“showed a trend”

53,323 sentences · 53,323 papers · 65,371 search hits before verification

In the literature

showed a trendp = 0.071.4× alpha
Plasma lipid levels were similar between the transplanted groups; however, the concentration of IL-6 was diminished by 37% ( p = 0.05) while TNF-α plasma levels showed a trend to decrease (43%, p = 0.07) in the group that received bone marrow from the exercised mice ( Table 3 ).
showed a trendp = .071.4× alpha
Consistent with the previous finding, however, and despite the lack of general change in spatial bias highlighted above, improvement in self-ratings showed a trend towards statistical significance in predicting post-intervention bias ( β = -0.18, p = .07) that was absent in the WMT ( β = 0.07, p = .53) and WL ( β = -0.06, p = .55) groups.
showed a trendp = 0.071.4× alpha
Treatment of polarized ARPE-19 cells with 100 nM ZK for 3 h showed a trend (p = 0.07) to increase BECN1 expression in low autophagy-/UPR-related gene-expressing cells (Fig. 6 c) but significantly decreased BECN1, MAP1LC3B, mTOR, ATF6, DDIT3, EIF2AK3 and HSPA5 expression (Fig. 6 a,c,d,f,j,k,m) in high autophagy-/UPR-related gene-expressing cells.
showed a trendp = 0.071.4× alpha
Interhemispheric functional connectivity For interhemispheric connectivity between non-dominant M1 and sensorimotor ROIs in the contralateral, dominant hemisphere, rmANOVA analyses with the between-subject factor ‘group’ (uCP, TD) and the within-subjects factor ‘interhemispheric M1-connectivity’ showed a trend toward a ‘group*connection’ interaction (F (3, 82) = 2.45, p = 0.07, Wilks’ Lambda = 0.92), indicating a different pattern between ROI pairs in each group (Table 1 , Fig. 1c ).
showed a trendp = 0.071.4× alpha
While no significant difference in absolute change in behaviors was noted between groups, participants not infected during follow-up showed a trend towards greater decreases in masking behavior in indoor public spaces (-0.49 vs. -0.33, p = 0.07) or masking in other people’s houses (-0.30 vs. -0.13, p = 0.06) compared to infected participants.