Barely Significant
← all phrases

“showed a trend”

53,323 sentences · 53,323 papers · 65,371 search hits before verification

In the literature

showed a trendP = 0.091.8× alpha
The comparison between foetuses with adequate development and foetuses affected by IUGR showed no significant differences in the IB breed, but IUGR conceptuses from the L group showed a trend for a higher plasma cholesterol concentrations (66.7±11.0 vs. 54.7 2.2, P = 0.09), due to a significant higher level of HDL-c (14.4±2.2 vs. 5.0±0.7, P <0.0005).
showed a trendp = 0.091.8× alpha
Exercise volume Although the subgroup analysis showed a trend toward statistical significance in FBG (χ 2 = 2.91, p = 0.09) and 2-hPBG (χ 2 = 3.20, p = 0.07) across exercise volumes, the high-volume subgroup (>600 MET-min/week) demonstrated substantially greater effects on FBG (SMD = −2.26, 95 % CI [−3.40, −1.13], I 2 = 97 %, p < 0.0001) and 2-hPBG (SMD = −3.24, 95 % CI [−5.01, −1.48], I 2 = 98 %, p = 0.0003).
showed a trendp = 0.091.8× alpha
A multivariable analysis adjusted for patient’s gender, age, income quartile, primary payor and comorbidities showed a trend towards lower in-hospital mortality and higher ICU utilization in NH-Blacks when compared to NH-Whites (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.55–1.05, p = 0.09 and OR 1.29, 95% CI 0.96–1.72, p = 0.09, respectively) and lower utilization of palliative care services in NH-Blacks when compared with NH-Whites (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.42–0.88, p = 0.01) (Table 2 ).
showed a trendp = 0.091.8× alpha
As for the relationship between sleep measures of the night preceding the DRM session and subsequent DRM performance, we observed a positive correlation between the total number of false memories and the number of night awakenings ( r = 0.267, p = 0.05), whereas the total number of veridical memories showed a trend to a significant positive correlation with sleep duration ( r = 0.266, p = 0.09).
showed a trendp = .091.8× alpha
For Model 2 a sensitivity analysis of biopsy type (Table 3 ) showed that first TCMR on a for‐cause biopsy was a significant correlate of death‐censored and all‐cause graft loss, while first TCMR on a surveillance biopsy showed a trend ( p = .09) toward an increased risk of death‐censored allograft loss and no significant association with all‐cause allograft loss after adjustment for baseline covariates, DGF, and ABMR.
Comparison between CON and MIA groups using one-way RM-ANOVA failed to reach statistical significance, although BI 409306 treatment showed a trend for attenuation of distance moved following Amph treatment (main effect of groups; F [4,40] = 2.1; P = 0.09; Fig. 1C ).