Barely Significant
← all phrases

“showed a trend”

53,323 sentences · 53,323 papers · 65,371 search hits before verification

In the literature

showed a trendP = .0911.8× alpha
According to classification of AKIP1 low/high+/high++/high+++ expression, increased grade of AKIP1 expression was correlated with larger tumor size ( P = .003), extrathyroidal invasion ( P < .001), higher pT stage ( P < .001), and it showed a trend to be positively correlated with pN stage ( P = .091) as well as pTNM stage ( P = .060) (but without statistical significance), while it was not correlated with age ( P = .437) or gender ( P = .492). 3.4.
showed a trendp = 0.0911.8× alpha
Responses to the doublet stimulus at 10 Hz showed a trend toward an increase following resistance exercise training ( p = 0.091) with a medium effect size in the control group (partial η 2 = 0.349), but the effect sizes were small in the 36°C group (partial η 2 = 0.065) and the 40°C group (partial η 2 = 0.168).
did not reach statistical significancep = 0.0911.8× alphaplainly factual
showed a trendp = 0.0911.8× alpha
In multivariate analyses, FGF-21 showed a trend toward a positive correlation with glucose disposal that did not reach statistical significance (standardized beta = 0.476, p = 0.091).
showed a trendp = 0.0911.8× alpha
Vasomotor-Associated Side Effects (Hot Flashes) In univariate analysis, individuals homozygous for UGT1A4 rs11888492 showed a trend toward a reduced risk of hot flashes (OR = 0.24; 95% CI = 0.05–1.25; p = 0.091); however, this association did not persist in the multivariate model.
showed a trendP = .0911.8× alpha
Comparison of clinical outcomes between patients with KMT2A -PTD <0.1% (group 1), ≥0.1% but <1% (group 2), and ≥1% (group 3) before HID HSCT Patients in group 3 had a higher 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse after HID HSCT (36.4%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.3%–66.5%) compared with those in group 1 (7.7%, 95% CI: 0.0%–16.2%) ( P = .016), and showed a trend of higher 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse compared with those in group 2 (7.1%, 95% CI: 0.0%–21.1%) ( P = .091) ( Fig. 3 A ).