Barely Significant
← all phrases

showed a trend

53,323 sentences · 53,323 papers · 65,371 search hits before verification

In the literature

showed a trendp = 0.0521.0× alpha
Although no correlation was observed between the sCD163 levels and TNM stage in a Spearman’s rho correlation test ( p = 0.141), an intergroup analysis revealed that patients with TNM stage IV tumors showed a trend towards higher sCD163 levels compared to TNM stage 0/I patients ( p = 0.052, Figure 2 B).
showed a trendp = 0,0521.0× alpha
A subgroup analysis focusing only on overweight/obese patients with type 2 diabetes revealed that plasma TG levels were significantly reduced in the KD group compared to the control-diet group (standardized mean difference (SMD), -0.32; p = 0.013), while the HDL levels showed a trend to increase with a p-value that tended to be significant (SMD, 0.07; p = 0,052) [ 64 ].
showed a trendp = 0.0521.0× alpha
TPS) alone did not influence LRC or PFS, patients with absent early hypoxia response and positive TPS exhibited significantly reduced LRC (HR = 3.374, 95% CI 1.192 - 9.548, p = 0.022) and showed a trend towards impaired PFS (HR = 2.752, 95% CI 0.992 - 7.631, p = 0.052).
showed a trendp = 0.0521.0× alpha
A recent phase II trial for patients with residual disease or high-risk pCR after receiving neoadjuvant or postoperative anti-HER2 agents reported that the GP2 vaccine had no significant benefit in DFS in the total population, yet a subset analysis showed a trend toward improved DFS in the HER2+ group that received the GP2 vaccine ( p = 0.052) [ 46 ].
showed a trendp = 0.0521.0× alpha
In all patients, a low NK cytotoxicity level [ Figure 2(c) ] did not significantly predict the survival outcome (61.1% versus 70.2%, p = 0.347), while the ferritin level higher than 5500 ng/ml [ Figure 2(d) ] showed a trend for poorer OS (55.6% versus 71.3%, p = 0.052).
showed a trendp = .0521.0× alpha
Specifically, in Session 1, 3h participants spent significantly more time in the reward containing zone than did both the 30min ( β = 0.08, SE = 0.04, t = 2.09, p = .038) and 27h ( β = 0.09, SE = 0.04, t = 2.19, p = .030) groups and, in Session 2, showed a trend of more time than did the 30min group ( β = 0.08, SE = 0.04, t = 1.96, p = .052); all other pairwise comparisons were not significant (i.e., there were no differences between the 30min group and the 27h group; |t|<1.24, p>0.21).