Barely Significant

Excerpts

3,473 sentences · 1 filter applied

The only marginally significant finding was a lower stranger-directed fear (SDF) score for Group 1A (singleton dogs with FDA score, had lived with other dogs previously) compared to Group 2 (singleton dogs with no FDA score; 0.364 ± 0.25 vs. 1.27 ± 0.23 respectively, W = 3.721, p = 0.042, Kruskal–Wallis with Dwass–Steel–Critchlow–Fligner pairwise comparisons).
Results were deemed statistically significant when p < 0.05, with * p < 0.05 indicating a significant difference, ** p < 0.01 indicating a very significant difference, and *** p < 0.001 indicating an extremely significant difference. “ns” indicates no significant difference. 3.
Performance Improvement and Sleep Since performance improvement (pre- to post-sleep reversal trial count difference) showed a trend-level association with the interaction of total ADHD score and sleep efficiency, we applied post hoc Johnson-Neyman analysis which revealed a statistically significant ( p < 0.05) association in dogs with a minimum of 39.6% sleep efficiency.