Barely Significant

Excerpts

3,451 sentences · 1 filter applied

borderline significantp = 0.051.0× alphagold
Median performance scores did not differ significantly between women (4.8, IQR 3.7–6.0) and men (5.0 IQR 3.6–6.0) However, satisfaction with performance was slightly lower among women (median 3.0, IQR 2.0–4.5) than among men (median 3.5, IQR 2.3–4.7), although this difference was borderline significant ( p = 0.05) (Table 4 ).
HIV-exposed infants whose mothers tested HIV-negative or were not tested during pregnancy or not taking ART during pregnancy were at increased risk of MTCT, as was starting infant antiretroviral prophylaxis after 72 h and incomplete antiretroviral treatment/prophylaxis (lack of anitretrovirals in either mother or baby or both), however these variables did not reach statistical significance ( p < 0.05).
borderline significantp = 0.051.0× alphagold
After adjustment for confounding by age, educational level, job demands and general health, the significant positive association between obesity and NFR observed in the unadjusted analysis (B = 13.45, 95%CI:4.03, 22.88, p = 0.005) changed into a borderline significant positive association (B = 8.77, 95% CI:0.01, 17.56, p = 0.05), with normal body weight as the reference category.
Relative to those who reported no lifetime MA use at baseline (Table 2 ), individuals who reported having ever used MA in their lifetime were more likely to have high levels of depressive symptoms using the recommended Thai cutoff score of ≥ 22 on the CES-D scale, but this measure of association did not reach statistical significance (POR: 1.48, CI: 1.04–2.11; p <0.05).
marginally significantp = 0.0501.0× alphagold
Similarly, social vulnerability predicted poorer ability to find good health information (β = –0.07, SE = 0.03, 95% CI: –0.13, –0.01, p = 0.029), which was linked to lower BFSE through a marginally significant indirect pathway (β = –0.31, SE = 0.16, 95% CI: –0.62, 0.00, p = 0.050).
a statistical trendp = 0.0501.0× alphagold
In this sense, paired individuals showed higher levels of LTMO in prepandemic context (study 1 and study 2) (M = 5.64, SE = 0.08) compared to face-to-face panstudy (M = 4.93, SE = 0.11; mean differences = 0.71, SE = 0.13, p < 0.001) and a statistical trend was found for the online panstudy (M = 5.29, SE = 0.12; mean differences = 0.36, SE = 0.15, p = 0.050).
weakly significantp < 0.051.0× alphaqualifiedgold
However, no significant relationship was found between the helpless approach and the submissive approach and the total needs score, and only a weakly significant relationship was found with the support sub-dimension ( r =-0.109, p < 0.05 for the helpless approach; r = 0.105, p < 0.05 for the submissive approach).