Barely Significant

Excerpts

4,726 sentences · 1 filter applied

marginally significantp = 0.0521.0× alphagold
A marginally significant association indicating a two-fold lower odds of test positivity was noted among Asian vs White patients (p = 0.052, OR 0.513, 95% CI 0.262-1.004); however, race was otherwise not noted to be predictive of test positivity.
marginal significancep = 0.0521.0× alphagold
Predictors of involvement in research based on statistically significant sociodemographic data Fifth-year students had significantly higher odds of research participation compared to second-year students (OR = 25.55, 95% CI: 5.57-117.21, p < 0.001), while age above 25 showed marginal significance (OR = 11.83, 95% CI: 0.97-143.75, p = 0.052) (Table 4 ).
marginally significantp = 0.0531.1× alphagold
Age emerged as a significant factor, with individuals aged 26-35 exhibiting a noteworthy increase in the odds of experiencing moderate to severe symptoms of ETD (Exp(B) = 3.899, p = 0.001), while those aged 36-45 showed a marginally significant increase (Exp(B) = 2.626, p = 0.053), in comparison to the reference group (18-25 years).
of borderline significancep = 0.0531.1× alpha
Patient factors associated with hospital length of stay On univariable (Mann-Whitney) testing, a significantly longer hospital stay was associated with coronary artery disease (p < 0.001), renal disease (p = 0.017), and prior stroke (p = 0.036); the association with diabetes mellitus was of borderline significance (p = 0.053).
borderline significantP-value=0.0531.1× alphagold
According to the binary logistic regression, the presence of only an anterior crossbite was significantly associated with a higher predictability for the occurrence of disc displacement and other joint disorders (OR 2.4; P-value=0.008, OR 2.34; P-value=0.01, respectively), but the association between the presence of only an anterior crossbite and a higher predictability for the occurrence of the muscle disorder was borderline significant (OR 2.09; P-value=0.053).
a trend towards significancep = 0.0531.1× alpha
Evaluation of normality with the Shapiro-Wilk test showed that for the continuous variable of time for removal per staple, the null hypothesis was rejected for Group A and Group B (p < 0.05 for both groups), with a trend towards significance for Group C (p = 0.053), yet no rejection of the null hypothesis for Group D (p = 0.445).