Barely Significant

Excerpts

4,234 sentences · 1 filter applied

highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Our relevant new analysis indicates that there is a highly significant negative correlation between protein content and gel consistency (r = −0.97, p < 0.001), a highly significant negative correlation with breakdown (BD) (r = −0.89, p < 0.001), and a significant negative correlation with setback (SB) (r = −0.62, p < 0.05).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
However, all glycated conjugates exhibited a highly significant decrease in α-helix content ( p < 0.001), dropping from 6.16 ± 0.21% (CGTPV) to 2.05 ± 0.06% (CSTPV), along with a corresponding increase in β-sheet content, from 32.12 ± 0.96% (CGTPV) to 37.42 ± 1.10% (CSTPV).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
It is worth noting that the contents of CAF, laccasein, and galangin reached highly significant increases ( p < 0.001) at 2 h, 4 h, and 6 h of high-temperature treatment compared with those before high-temperature treatment, and showed an overall increasing trend with the lengthening of the high-temperature treatment ( Figure 4 ).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Pearson Correlation Analysis As illustrated in Figure 8 , storage temperature showed a highly significant negative correlation with the a* value (redness) of the 3D-printed pork products ( p < 0.001), while it exhibited highly significant positive correlations with TVB-N, peroxide value (PV), and the concentrations of Maillard reaction products (A 294 and A 420 ) ( p < 0.001).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The TFC in different extracts is presented in Figure 2 , with the highest TFC found in the 75% glycerol extract (25.52 ± 1.35 mg RTE/g) and the lowest in the 25% ethyl acetate extract (2.13 ± 0.28 mg RTE/g), showing highly significant differences among the various extract TFCs ( p < 0.001).
highly significantp = 0.00100.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The inter-group difference was tested through anosim analysis, and the results indicated that the difference between the groups was highly significant (R = 0.7215, p = 0.0010), implying that the beta diversity of the gut microbiome in diabetic mice was significantly improved by TFs intervention, consistent with the results of alpha diversity analysis. 3.4.
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Data Analysis The effect of EO and time of packaging were evaluated through ANOVA one-way with the STATISTIC 2014 SW program (StatSoft Inc., Tulsa, OK, USA), in which the effect was considered not significant when p ≥ 0.05; significant when p < 0.05; very significant when p < 0.01; and highly significant when p < 0.001, and determined by Tukey’s HSD test (“Honestly Significantly Different”). 3.