Excerpts

For employees with low construal level, the positive relationship between EO REO and voice behavior is marginally significant when challenge stressor is high ( Slope = 0.205, S.E. = 0.126, p < 0.1 ) and the positive relationship between EO REO and voice behavior is not significant when challenge stressor is low ( Slope = 0.109, S.E. = 0.128, p > 0.1 ).

Leader narcissism showed a marginally significant negative relation with entrepreneurial team performance (β = −0.241, p < 0.10).

For sentences with a missing VP2, the contrast between main and embedded S1 clause was marginally significant (33 vs. 41%, z = 1.65, p = 0.10). 5.3.

When analyzing L2-French speakers, the main effect of Connective was not significant, F (1, 27.83) < 1, ns , yet there was a close-to-significant Connective by Relation interaction effect, F (1, 1037.64) = 2.72, p = 0.10.

Only variables that showed significant or near-significant correlations ( p < 0.10) with the dependent variables of interest were selected for further multiple linear regression analyses.

Of the low-level visual variables, color similarity (brightness histograms across the various color channels) was significant in the recognition task, and vertical spectral amplitude approached significance on the location task ( p < 0.1).

The Number of Dominant Images A marginally significant association was found between “The number of dominant images” and the two groups of families ( χ 2 = 3.68, p < 0.10).

Minor injuries (Model 2) have also decreased by 25% in the peripheral districts of the city [although the coefficient is weakly significant ( p < 0.1)].

Effects that approached either significance ( p ≤ 0.05) or marginal significance ( p ≤ 0.10) are reported in the Results Section.

Although the differences were only marginally significant, F (2,57) = 2.31, p = 0.10, η p 2 = 0.08, the mean ratios of performance impairment by image manipulation in Experiment 3 (11.7 ± 2.6%; Mean ± SE) was larger than those in Experiment 2 (9.1 ± 2.2%) and Experiment 1 (4.7 ± 2.2%) for the direction detection task.

A few of these correlations were either marginally statistically significant ( p < 0.10) or not statistically significant (see Table 6 ).

Only significant effects and certain effects approaching significance ( p < 0.100) that include the congruity factor are reported.

On the between-level, EE is positively related to trait EL, but not to (aggregated) state EL (only having a marginally significant relationship, p < 0.10).

These results show that trust has a negative impact on anxiety but is weakly significant from a statistical viewpoint (β = −0.139, p < 0.10).

There were significant correlations for most of the decision scores for Studies 1 and 2 ( Table 5 ), except that UC2 scores were significantly correlated only with UC scores in Study 1, and Study 1 HC scores were not significantly correlated with any Study 2 scores, though LC2, MC2, and HC2 scores approached significance ( p < 0.1).

Students majoring in engineering/physics were also found to have lower perceptions of caring but the effect was only marginally significant (β = −0.103, p < 0.10).

However, the strength of this association was reduced and only marginally significant ( p < 0.10) when preference for the equity principle, gender, and academic unit were added to the equation.

Additionally, the main effect of emotion and the interaction between presentation condition and visual field were marginally significant [ F (1,22) = 3.47, p < 0.1; F (1,22) = 3.21, p < 0.1].

For Orbic muscle activation, the only finding that was approaching significance was that greater change in Orbic activity was associated with greater general NM (ß = 0.18, p < 0.10, R 2 = 0.03, F (1, 121) = 3.79, p = 0.054), indicating that those higher in general NM were incorrectly activating muscles around their eyes when intentionally mimicking a neutral face.

Only significant ( p ≤ 0.05), or marginally significant ( p ≤ 0.10), associations are described.

Unfortunately, there was no significant reduction found in willingness or capacity, although there was a trend toward significance for slight image creation and image protection ( p < 0.10).

However, the indirect effect of individualism on promoting hygiene and cleaning through affective attitude and feeling of risk was marginally significant ( p < 0.10) based on unadjusted estimates.

As can be seen in the figure, children showed significant shape responding for the clay, M = 0.64, t (74) = 5.16, p < 0.0001, and wood sets, M = 0.68, t (73) = 5.90, p < 0.0001, and marginally significant shape responding for the sand, M = 0.56, t (73) = 1.89, p < 0.10, and Styrofoam sets, M = 0.55, t (74) = 1.76, p < 0.10.

Simple slope analysis was conducted for Bus plunge as well because there was a weakly significant interaction between IAcc and moral choice ( B = 0.456, p < 0.1).

There was a marginally significant main effect of BIS affect, b = 0.17, SE = 0.10, β = 0.32, t (65) = 1.69, p < 0.10, all other p s > 0.22.