Repeated measures analysis of variance with reading rate with and without overlays as factors revealed a highly significant effect of overlay F (1,93) = 30.9, p < 0.0005 and a highly significant interaction term F (1,93) = 8.57, p = 0.004, indicating that the effect of overlays was greater among participants who reported that the overlay made the text easier and more comfortable to read.
Excerpts
Nevertheless, the recording-first group showed quantitatively greater improvement while improvement in the quote-first group was only borderline significant (recording-first improvement = 1.29, t 51 = 3.67, p < 0.0006, d = 0.49; quote-first improvement = 0.59, t 43 = 1.96, p < 0.057, d = 0.29; Figure 4C ).
A Kruskal–Wallis test revealed highly significant differences between groups (controls, mHE, HE, see Table 1 ) for the CFF [χ 2 (2) = 14.83, p = 0.0006].
As shown in Figures 1 and 2 , gender differences in perceived mathematics ability in 10th and 12th grades are highly significant ( p < 0.001).
On the basis of these preliminary results we run a Univariate General Linear Model in order to explore the effect of age on the intertemporal choice performance obtained by summing the two IC scores, controlling for F-Sat, S-SAT METVOC, 1st FB understanding, Although the unique contribute of age was highly significant, accounting for the 14.8% of the total variance of the intertemporal choice performance [ F (2, 88) = 8.816, p < 0.001, θ = 0.967], the covariates share enough variance in common with intertemporal choice, cancelling the main effect of age.
However, there was a highly significant interaction between these factors [ F (4, 48) = 6.97, p = 0.001, η 2 p = 0.37].
There are two important differences between the two groups regarding the prediction model of ED: the model explains the higher ED variance in psoriasis patients (35%) when compared to healthy persons (19%), and the contribution of expressive suppression is moderately significant in healthy persons ( p < 0.05), and quite significant in psoriasis patients ( p < 0.001) ( Table 7 ).
The result was highly significant— F (16.02, 4236.45) = 81.65, p < 0.001, with Greenhouse-Geiser correction for violations of sphericity.
Non-normality was suggested by histograms, Q-Q plots, and highly significant Kolmogorov–Smirnov tests [all D (89) > 0.21, all p < 0.001].
In this study, it is found that entrepreneurs’ technological creative innovation behavior, business creative innovation behavior, and organizational performance have extremely significant positive correlation ( p < 0.001), while the standardized regression coefficient of entrepreneurial relationship acquisition behavior and organizational performance is 0.632, showing a significant positive correlation ( p < 0.05).
The Wilcoxon signed-rank test shows a highly significant difference between participation in each type of activity ( Z = −6.05, p < 0.001).
After rigorously controlling for these significant demographic and clinical variables, the indirect pathway from childhood maltreatment to suicidal ideation through difficulties in emotion regulation remained highly significant ( p < 0.001), providing robust evidence for the stability of this mediating mechanism across different clinical contexts.
For example, for the 14 ability domains used in the College Board survey, Kruger (1999) found a highly significant relationship between domain difficulty and the percentage of participants rating themselves as better than average in that domain, r = -0.81, p < 0.001.
different = 2), as an additional level 1 predictor in a second step produced a highly significant effect for this variable, β = 34.21, t = 9.30, p < 0.001, and it rendered the effect for the CL variable non-significant, β = 0.59, t = 0.28, p = 0.78.
Loving-kindness meditation increases connectedness to others Main effects of meditation type, chills augmentation, and chills occurrence An ANCOVA revealed Meditation Type as a highly significant predictor of connectedness to others ( Figure 1 ) following intervention ( F (1, 372) = 28.94, p < 0.001).
An MI value greater than 10.83 reflects a highly significant improvement at P < 0.001 and should be prioritized in model modifications ( Just Enough, n.d. ).
In addition, with respect to perceived learning achievement, participants showed highly significant differences in stressors, stress symptoms, coping strategies, and overall academic engagement and its dimensions, with U > 23790.500 and p = 0.001, such that greater perceived learning was associated with lower stress-related factors and higher academic engagement, although the effect sizes were small to approaching moderate (see Table 4 ).
The condition effect for arousal was highly significant [ F (2,117) = 318.85, p < 0.001].
Even when this distribution is dropped to have 10,000 randomly selected comparisons from each condition, there is still an extremely significant difference of F (1,19,999) = 1,004.58, p < 0.001.
T-test showed that Cohen’s d is 0.341, which exceeds the level of 0.2 and is highly significant ( t = 7.136, two-sided p < 0.001).
Comparing the accuracies of the four participants to the combined accuracies of their permuted data yielded a highly significant difference at the group level ( t = −5.0, p < 0.001).
Results showed a highly significant main effect of viewing condition for laughs, F (2,34) = 12.93, p < 0.001 with a generalized eta squared, ges = 0.25.
Separate analyses revealed that the effect of Condition was highly significant in L1 ( F (1, 1939.5) = 23.8, p < 0.001), but there was no such effect in L2 ( F (1, 1939.5) = 1.35, p = 0.246).
The only minor change was observed in the energy saving problem, with cued recall (Δ R 2 = 0.024, p = 0.075), verbal fluency (Δ R 2 = 0.042, p = 0.059), and knowledge/experience (Δ R 2 = 0.062, p = 0.012) all showing marginally significant or significant effects, but ideation fluency still contributing more than the sum of these effects (Δ R 2 = 0.168, p < 0.001).
HPES groups) two-way ANOVA on CPCN after priming revealed that the main effect for Priming was not significant ( F < 1), whereas the main effect for Explanatory Style was highly significant, F (1,110) = 15.19, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.121.