Excerpts

These slopes showed a clear trend toward being significantly different between them ( Z = 1.48, p = 0.06).

While the Consonant-Vowel contrast on the intercept term was not significant (β = 0.05, SE = 0.19, p = 0.81), its interaction with time was marginally significant (linear time parameter: β = 0.38, SE = 0.21, p = 0.06; cubic time parameter: β = −0.40, SE = 0.21, p = 0.06).

A 2 (gender) × 3 (experimental conditions) ANOVA on the perceived importance of the socially related SDGs indicated a significant main effect of experimental conditions, F (2,293) = 4.72, p = 0.01, η p 2 = 0.08, a significant main effect of gender, F (1,293) = 23.95, p < 0.01, η p 2 = 0.08, and a marginally significant interactive effect of gender and experimental conditions, F (2,293) = 2.82, p = 0.06, η p 2 = 0.02.

The moderating effect of the risk domain factor was marginally significant [ Q M(1) = 3.29, p = 0.06; heterogeneity: Q E(17) = 232.10, p < 0.001].

Marginally significant differences were found between the female and male groups at baseline for inter- and intra-hemispheric gamma coherence [ t (35) = 1.97, 1.96, p = 0.06], but not for theta or alpha.

Time of testing approached significance ( p = 0.06), because participants tended to make more errors during quarantine (mean = 1.17) than before it (mean = 0.96).

While the main effect of Part-Whole Condition was only marginally significant, F (1,37) = 3.75, MSE = 161151.68, p = 0.060, there was a significant Orientation by Part-Whole Condition interaction, F (1,37) = 30.71, MSE = 112415.92, p < 0.001.

A similar HLM for response latency yielded a main effect for consistency, b = 0.33 ( SE = 0.03), t (7268) = 9.89, and p < 0.0001, a marginally significant main effect of consensus, b = 0.005 ( SE = 0.002), t (133) = 1.90, and p = 0.060, and no interaction, t (7235) = 0.84 and p = 0.400.

The difference between the two measurements was marginally significant with Wilcoxon Signed Ranks test, Z = − 1.87, p = 0.06.

It should also be noted that although the interaction of worries with HWS-PE was only marginally significant ( p = 0.06), the same trend was observed (i.e., that the effect of COVID-19 worries on anxiety was stronger among individuals with low HWS-PE).

A chi-square test revealed a marginally significant association between hassle and behavioral orientation ( χ 2 = 5.63, df = 2, p = 0.06).

The model with word fluency and age tended toward significance ( p = 0.06), whereas the addition of the text fluency variables showed a significant change in explained variance for the model.

Rotation had a significant effect on RTs, F (1,21) = 19.65, MSe = 7459.94, p < 0.001, and a marginally significant effect on errors, F (1,21) = 4.19, MSe = 0.03, p < 0.06, with rotated conditions being 13 ms faster and 2.7% more often correct.

Although the interaction only marginally approached significance ( p = 0.06), we can observe a much stronger improvement in the science group following the intervention (the correct response rate raised from 58% to 89%, compared to 50% vs. 54% in the humanities group).

For game 1 (n-shaped), greater anticipatory SCR was associated (an almost significant correlation) with improved performance, OR (odds ratio) = 0.03, p = 0.06, R 2 = 0.001.

Also, results showed a marginally significant three-way interaction effect of condition and time on impulse control, controlling for the presentation order, F (1,73) = 3.73; p = 0.06; η p 2 = 0.05.

Post hoc analysis of the interaction using the Johnson-Neyman technique, as shown in Figure 1 , revealed no significant relation between T1 EF and T2 PPVT for TH children ( t = 0.99, p = 0.33), but a marginally significant negative relation for DHH children ( t = –1.91, p = 0.06), such that lower (better) T1 EF scores were significantly related with higher (better) T2 PPVT scores.

Moreover, self-control was related to a reduction in the number of words per minute, at a marginally significant level ( r = −0.24, p < 0.06).

ANOVA also revealed marginally significant interaction between self-referential type and caudality [ F (8,136) = 2.78, p = 0.06].

We found a marginally significant main effect (β = 0.16, SE = 0.09, p = 0.06): mothers who spent more time engaging in maternal behaviors also had higher levels of baseline cortisol over weeks 1 and 2.

Using Pillai’s trace, the multivariate statistics revealed a main effect of WTC on cognitive functioning, F (3,31) = 3.32, p = 0.03, η 2 = 0.24, as well as a marginally significant interaction between WTC and leisure time activity, F (3,31) = 2.79, p = 0.06, η 2 = 0.21, but no main effect of leisure-time activity, F (3,31) = 1.48, p = 0.24, η 2 = 0.13, and voluntariness in WTC, F (3,31) = 2.03, p = 0.13, η 2 = 0.16.

Faculty ratings varied at a marginal significance level according to experimental group ( F = 2.89, p < 0.06).

The AgCC group revealed a borderline significant correlation between ToM and the SDQ Peer Problems subscale [ r (17) = −0.45, p = 0.06], and the Prosocial subscale marginally correlated with ToM [ r (17) = 0.46, p = 0.06], complex mental state recognition [ r (18) = 0.42, p = 0.08], and inhibitory control [ r (15) = 0.48, p = 0.06].

For response times, a marginally significant main effect of online review [ M positive = 1078.787 ms, SE = 62.632; M negative = 999.723 ms, SE = 53.379; F (1, 22) = 3.948, p = 0.060, η 2 = 0.152] and a significant main effect of brand familiarity were identified [ M familiar = 1065.109 ms, SE = 59.244; M unfamiliar = 1013.401 ms, SE = 52.142; F (1,22) = 5.385, p < 0.05, η 2 = 0.197].

For the analysis of different score of d4, d3, d2, d1 for both high- and low-level group together, it showed that there is no significant difference in d3, d2, and d1 for two groups, with marginal significance in d4, p = 0.06.