Excerpts

As predicted, majority decision-making yielded a marginally significant positive relationship to team performance for teams with high task representations and high leadership ambiguity ( t = 1.85, p = 0.07; see slope 1 in Figure 4 ) and a significant negative relationship to team performance for teams with low shared task representations and high leadership ambiguity ( t = −4.56, p < 001; see slope 3 in Figure 4 ).

For painfulness ratings, the main effect of facial expression type shows a trend toward significance [ F (2,42) = 2.81, p = 0.07, η p 2 = 0.12).

Animals exhibited a statistical trend consistent with a gradual decline of exploratory activity during the first three training days ( F = 3.31, P = 0.07, one-way repeated measures ANOVA), and a comparison in total exploration time between the first and third training sessions reached statistical significance ( P < 0.05, t = 2.81, df = 6, paired samples t -test).

The results of a chi-square test showed a near-significant trend ( p = 0.07) for the presence of isolated sí “yes” responses in rejecting vs. confirming answers [χ 2 (1, 48) = 3.08, p = 0.07].

The comparison of (O1 + O2 + O3 + EQ) for Experiment 3 does not reach statistical significance, although a trend towards significance is apparent ( P = 0.07, t = 2.05, df = 8) that was not seen for the O1 + O2 + O3 parameter ( P > 0.1, t = 1.41, df = 8).

Furthermore, the intervention predicted participants’ personal norm marginally significant ( B = −0.17; p = 0.07, CI [−0.349; 0.016]), which in turn predicted participants’ willingness to offer expired but still edible food highly significant ( B = 0.05, p < 0.001, CI [0.019; 0.076]).

The regression analysis showed a significant main effect for spatial ability [β = −0.507, se(HC4) = 0.181, p = 0.007], no main effect of condition [β = 0.703, se(HC4) = 0.399, p = 0.10], and a marginally significant interaction effect between spatial ability and condition [β = 0.224, se(HC4) = 0.123, p = 0.07].

For example, parent use of praise per minute was related to parent spatial language per minute, r (31)=0.52, p <0.05, and the relation between parent praise and parent use of persistence-focused language per minute was approaching significance, r (31)=0.33, p =0.07.

Intellectual activities had a marginally significant ( p = 0.07) impact on AMT overall: Estimate = 0.084, [−0.007 to 0.17], but did not interact with time.

Liking factual text showed a trend to be associated with slower reaction times (β = 283.98, s.e. = 146.40, t = 1.94, p = 0.07).

There was a main effect of prime type on relative accuracy, F (1,68) = 4.63, p < 0.05, and a marginally significant cognitive load by prime-type interaction, F (1,68) = 3.33, p = 0.07.

447), however, a dominance effect was attested, as the study reported the main effect of dominance approaching significance in 20 simultaneous Cantonese-English bilinguals ( p = 0.07), suggesting that the children made fewer head errors as their Cantonese dominance increased.

The moderating role of mental health literacy on the relationship between psychological vulnerability and adolescent anxiety was left marginally significant ( p = 0.07).

A marginally significant main effect of button function was found [ F (1,80) = 3.38, p = 0.070, η p 2 = 0.04], together with a significant interaction effect of age group and button function [ F (2,80) = 3.51, p = 0.035, η p 2 = 0.08].

Moreover, fatalistic determinism is negatively correlated with the internal locus of control in the FAD-J, but not significant in the FAD+ (the difference is so-called marginally significant, Z = 1.831, p = 0.07).

Time and group revealed a marginally significant interaction, F (1,37) = 3.43, p = 0.07, η p 2 = 0.09.

Consumption cost had a marginally significant effect on the number of clips [ F (1,71) = 3.36, p = 0.07]: Participants selected slightly more clips in the low-cost condition ( M = 5.59, SD = 2.84) than in the high-cost condition ( M = 4.47, SD = 2.41).

There was, however, a marginal trend toward significance [ t (47) = 1.84, p = 0.07, d = 0.53], whereby ratings in the failure condition tended to be higher than in the loss condition.

Raising children had marginal significance on health membership ( p = 0.07).

To explore whether chills were more moving or intense in the original stimuli, ratings were compared across experiences of chills in original and manipulated conditions; a difference approaching significance between conditions was found for being moved and emotional intensity ratings in chills experiences [ F (2, 48) = 2.67, p = 0.07]; notably, chills were rated as more intense in the original conditions [ F (2, 48) = 10.22, p = 0.0004, partial eta 2 = 0.11], but not more moving.

Simple effects analyses found that in pain condition, participants experienced marginally significant more self-uncomfortableness for high facial attractive actors ( M = 3.41, SE = 0.12) compared to those for low facial attractive actors ( M = 3.34, SE = 0.12, p = 0.07); in non-pain condition, no such difference was found ( p = 0.18).

The main effect of RD on visual-spatial WM was marginally significant [ F (1, 172)=3.32, p =0.07].

Similarly, the difference between the score of DMT students group and the score of art studies students group approached significance ( p = 0.07).

For high-frequency words, there was a marginal significance NS effect ( p = 0.07), while for low-frequency words, large neighborhood words had a significantly high accuracy rate than small neighborhood words ( p < 0.001), as shown in Figure 1A .

Career self-efficacy expectations and academic achievement quadratic trends also demonstrated a negative and statistically marginally significant association, r = −0.09, p = 0.07.