Excerpts

In-depth examination using partial correlation analysis, while controlling for age and generalized anxiety, indicated that anxiety and anger under gaming conditions displayed only marginally significant correlations with gaming disorder scores (mean anxiety-disorder score: r = 0.296, p = 0.075; mean anger-disorder score: r = 0.319, p = 0.054).

We found a marginally significant trend where participants informed about the effects of N 2 O showed only slightly increased intentions to reduce consumption [ β = 0.932, t (190.386) = 1.792, p = 0.075].

In contrast, the HOC group ( M = 12.48, SD = 5.06) showed a trend toward a higher sense of negative agency compared to the LOC group [( M = 9.64, SD = 2.87), t (22.47) = 1.87, p = 0.075, d = 0.69]. 3.2.3 Explaining implicit sense of agency – regression analysis Tone binding in the HOC group was significantly predicted by OCI-R total scores ( F (1, 13) = 5.53, R 2 = 0.298, p = 0.035; beta = −10.49, t = −2.35, p = 0.035).

Moreover, the effect of candidate’s capability on hireability ratings only approached significance, F (2,371) = 2.60, p = 0.075, η 2 = 0.01.

We found two trends, one negative trend for people born in Southern/Eastern Europe ( OR = 0.456, SE = 0.216, p = 0.098), and a positive trend for people who have foreign citizenship only ( OR = 3.432, SE = 2.372, p = 0.075) when far-right voting and its interactions terms were included.

Under the trailing condition with the positive frame, the difference in risk-taking percentages between proficient and expert athletes approached significance ( p = 0.0752), but novice athletes showed significantly lower risk-taking percentages than both expert ( p < 0.001) and proficient athletes ( p < 0.001).

In terms of peak displacement, the difference observed between static and dynamic expressions (1.33 cpf) was marginally significant [95% CI (−1.66, 1.66), p = 0.0759].

However, for participants who read-aloud with the child, there was a positive and marginally significant relationship between amount of extra-textual talk and participants’ positive mood scores ( r =0.58, p =. 076).

Other interactions with these two factors were also not significant, except the marginally significant T2 Side × Lag × Number of Distractors interaction ( F (2, 80) = 2.7, p = 0.076, η 2 = 0.06), which reflects the slightly decreased LVF advantage at Lag 5 when the number of distractors was reduced (T2 Side × Number of Distractors for Lag 5 only: F (1, 40) = 4.0, p = 0.051; LVF vs.

The change in destructive leadership showed marginally significant individual variability (slope σ 2 = 0 0.012, p = 0.076).

In addition, the correlation between male Pf and sociosexual behavior (SOIR1) that approached significance by Spearman rank correlation analysis ( r 100 = −0.22, p = 0.076), reached statistical significance by estimation of the confidence intervals for this correlation (95% CI [−0.406, −0.025]).

We also compared memory accuracy within the same arousal condition, and found that there was a marginally significant difference in d-prime for objects in the cued location compared to the uncued location in the CS+ trials ( p = 0.076).

However, discipline identification was marginally significant, β = −0.15 (95% CI = −0.31, 0.01), SE = 0.08, p = 0.076 (all other βs < 0.07, p s > 0.101), such that greater identification with one’s discipline was associated with lower stress.

An Age Group (Young-Old) by Language Status (EFL-ESL) by Target Timbre Between-subjects ANOVA on Mill Hill vocabulary scores found a highly significant effect of language status [EFLs had higher vocabulary scores than ESLs: F (1, 66) = 26.905, p < 0.001], and a nearly significant effect of Age-Group [ F (1, 66) = 3.258, p = 0.076] where older adults had higher vocabulary scores than younger adults.

Importantly, there was also a marginally significant three-way interaction between self-status, other-status, and offer level, F (1,92) = 3.22, p = 0.076, η p 2 = 0.03.

Single-word reading was again found to be a significant predictor of spelling accuracy ( β = 0.751, p < 0.001) and oral language ability also approached significance ( β = 0.148, p < 0.076).

In the cellist group, there was a borderline significant T2 Type × Lag interaction effect, F (2, 34) = 2.779, p = 0.076, η p 2 = 0.141.

However, the result of a chi-square difference test showed that the difference in fit of the two models approached significance, but did not surpass the 0.05 alpha level, Δχ 2 (1) = 3.14, p = 0.076.

Post-hoc analyses revealed marginally significant higher arousal ratings for negative stimuli that were presented for 1000 ms than 200 ms, t (300) = 1.81, p = 0.076, d = 0.21, and no effect of duration for positive stimuli, t (300) = 1.12, p = 0.268, d = 0.13.

The main effect of neuroticism on the hands-on-steering-wheel time was marginally significant [ F (1,30) = 3.310, p = 0.076].

Our analysis of beta values revealed a marginally significant effect of presentation time [ F (2,66) = 2.67, p = 0.076, η p 2 = 0.075], which was qualified by a significant interaction between presentation time and task [ F (1266) = 6.15, p = 0.004, η p 2 = 0.16].

The hours spent variable showed a trend in explaining EE ( p = 0.076), and age was significant ( p = 0.008) (see Table 7 ).

The Direction main effect was nearly significant ( p = 0.076), but since a three-factor interaction involving Direction was significant, this main effect has not been further investigated.

In the treatment group there is a slight marginally significant decrease (T1 = 2.83; T2 = 1.91; p = 0.076) between the pre and post measure but then there is a significant increase in the follow-up measure (T3 = 3.00; p = 0.000).

The difference between the two lengths was close to significance in the leftward ingoing/rightward outgoing Stimulus ( p = 0.076).