The asterisk indicates a significant between-group difference (p < .05) and the star a trend towards significance (p < .10), whereas the additional symbols denote significant relationships between the graph measure and either general intelligence or processing speed at the corresponding sparsity (p < .05).
Part-time workers may have been less likely to report depression and anxiety than full-time workers (aOR 0.51 (95%CI 0.22–1.11) and 0.36 (95%CI 0.13–0.84), respectively), but this was only of borderline significance (p > 0.1 for depression, p = 0.026 for anxiety) and may be an artefact of multiple comparisons.
Months of food sufficiency was found positive but has marginally significant effect (p < 0.1) on the likelihood of engaging in community groups.
Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05; marginal significance was set at p < 0.10.
To assess each clinical characteristic's absence on the occurrence of ICU-AW, logistic regression analysis was conducted, correcting for risk factors that showed a significant trend (P ≤ 0.1) in univariate analysis.
The predictors effect was considered statistically significant if the p-value < 0.05, although marginally significant effects (p-value <0.1) were also considered.
For the interaction effects of significant (p < 0.05) and marginally significant (0.05 < p < 0.1) interaction effects, a multiple means comparison of the 20 treatment combinations was performed using the Tukey multiple range test at the level of significance of 5 % to generate the grouping of letters. 3.
Wilcoxon's signed-rank test revealed a marginally significant difference (defined as when 0.05 ≤ p < 0.1) between both conditions ( z = 1.83, p = 0.068).
Both the linear (PSW) and quadratic (PSW 2 ) terms are marginally significant (p < 0.1), indicating their potential relevance in predicting Flexural Strength.
The linear regression coefficient was marginally statistically significant when the 2012 ASIR prostate cancer data were used (p < 0.1).
In the original regression, PI_all_city_CC (command-and-control policy intensity) is weakly significant (p < 0.1) with a positive coefficient of 0.013, while PI_all_city_MB (market-based policy intensity) is statistically significant (p < 0.05) with a positive coefficient of 0.016.
In the year 2003–2010, the result is slightly significant ( ß = 0.0518, p < 0.1), in the year 2011–2017, the impact is more significant ( ß = 0.0718, P < 0.05).
Last but not least, there was a marginally statistically significant three-way interaction among message framing, psychological distance, and narrative image types [F (1, 227) = 3.293, p < 0.1].
It is worth mentioning that pain intensity was a marginally significant (p < 0.1) predictor of moderate pain catastrophizing group membership.
Significance was set at p < .05, with p < .001 being highly significant, and additionally, p < .1 was considered to be the presence of a favourable statistical trend.
According to Table 7 , the linear effect of solution pH (A), initial ion concentration (B), and adsorbent dosage (C) was significant (p < 0.0001) and the contact time (D) linear effect was moderately significant (p = 0.1280) for DS-TiO 2 ; while for OP-TiO 2 the linear adsorbent dosage, and solution pH was significant (p < 0.0001) and the contact time and initial concentration linear effect was moderately significant.
In addition, a recent review involving a total of 4,347 published papers yielded hardly significant benefits in communication skills (p = .139) and a significant improvement for general social functioning (p = .001) in children with ASD, related to the regular practice of sport and physical activity in small groups.
After this plateau, WAI slightly decreased with increasing FMC (borderline significance: 0.05 < p < 0.15).
The OS of TFE3-rearranged RCC was not significantly different between TFE3(+) ccRCC and TFE3(−) RCC; however, it still showed a trend that TFE3(+) ccRCC had a worse OS [ P = 0.151, HR = 2.813, 95% CI = (0.576, 13.737)].
Additional analysis done separately for individual positive trait scores showed a significant negative correlation for agreeableness score (r = −0.36, p-value = 0.03) ( Fig S3a ) and a negative trend for openness (r = −0.24, p-value = 0.16), extraversion (r = −0.15, p-value = 0.37) and conscientiousness (r = −0.26, p-value = 0.12).
Overall, the number of PAH uncontrolled diabetic complications increased on average by 28 per year (17–40), those of short-term diabetic complications did not show a significant trend (p = 0.162), those of long-term diabetic complications increased by 89 per year (70–109) and the overall number of PAH increased by 112 per year (89–135). 3.2.1 General characteristics of potentially avoidable hospitalizations Total admissions for diabetes represented between 0.3 and 0.5 % of all hospital admissions in Switzerland, while admissions for PAH represented an even smaller percentage, ranging between 0.13 and 0.21 %.
Figure 1 b, showed that there is a highly significant negative correlation between lymphocytes and ESR (r = 0.36; P = 0.22).
The mice treated with the GTP did not show such a significant trend ( Fig. 2 E, p = 0.260, Student's t-test).
4 C): An increasing trend at a rate of 1.80 DDDs/100PD ( P = 0.29) per month was observed in the pre-intervention period.
HELL-treated specimens had a roughness of 8 ± 1 nm (Figures 1 b and 3 ), significantly not different from the non-treated samples (p = 0.301).