For RS, the omnibus test indicated message condition was marginally significant on perceived absolute ENDS risk, F (2, 192) = 3.02, p = 0.05, η p 2 = 0.03.
Excerpts
Post hoc analysis revealed a borderline significant decrease in plasma CXCL5 levels from baseline to 6-months (−440.86 pg/mL, 95% CI = −799.79 to −81.93, p = 0.05) in the waitlist control group ( Figure 2 d).
We identified a decreasing trend in the gap between females and males: from 4.53 years in 2008, to 4.12 years in 2018, which was statistically significant (t-value = −7.67, p < 0.05).
A moderate practically significant positive correlation (r = 0.43, p < 0.05) emerged between process and product measures of the jumping skill, with the arm action reflecting the strongest correlation (r = 0.28 and r = 0.23 in both trails).
Further, based on the nominally significant (single CpG site p -value < 0.05) CpGs within each of the DMRs, there was a general trend towards consistent association directions with increasing BTEX exposure for the DMRs.
bordered on significancep = 0.05
The association bordered on significance ( p = 0.05). 3.3.
The same trend was also observed for carbonate with Fe (r 2 = 0.88), Mn (r 2 = 0.88), Zn (r 2 = 0.72) and Cu (r 2 = 0.86), and a moderately negative correlation with As (r 2 = −0.55; p < 0.05) in the core of Chaube Chhapra but it showed a positive correlation with Zn (r 2 = 0.75) and a moderately significant with Mn (r 2 = 0.44; p < 0.05) only.
The Tree1*Grass2 variable was moderately significant ( p = 0.050), indicating that the sidewalk with trees on one side and grass on both sides had a 0.613 °C lower air temperature gap between children and adults, compared to the sidewalk with no tree and no grass.
Regions of western and eastern Africa (e.g., Namibia, Zambia, Nigeria, etc.), Turkmenistan, China’s coastal region and the Korean Peninsula are either generally significant or slightly significant ( p < 0.05 and p < 0.1).
The relationship is marginally significant for xylene/ethylbenzene ( p -value = 0.120), while the association between toluene and respiratory function is more highly significant ( p -value = 0.050).
a trend towards significancep = 0.05
Moreover, a trend towards significance was found for the task (F 1.61 = 3.82; p = 0.05; ηp 2 = 0.06; Figure 4 B) showing a better performance in the Color (1.28 ± SE 0.25) with respect to Valence task (1.22 ± SE 0.26).
It was also positively associated with increased Hg, although it failed to reach statistical significance at a p < 0.05 level (β = 0.42, p = ( p = 0 .0790)).
Employment in Model 1 changed from marginally significant to significant at p < 0.05 ( p = 0.049).
In addition, a marginally significant group by time effect was found for positive adaptation coping, F (1, 46.18) = 3.94, p = 0.05, 95% CI: −0.03–4.65, Hedges’ g = 1.08, with the intervention group reporting improvements in positive adaptation coping from pre- ( M = 24.80, SD = 3.95) to post- ( M = 25.50, SD = 3.18) assessment compared to participants in the waitlist control group (preassessment: M = 23.57, SD = 4.89; post-assessment: M = 21.95, SD = 3.41).
Having one or more chronic medical conditions, being a member of a community of color (African American/black, Hispanic/Latino), and having less income are significant predictors of higher risk perceptions; being female is of near significance ( p = 0.05).
The AUC comparison for anxiety was marginally significant (Z = 1.93, p = 0.05), indicating that the Loneliness Scale was slightly more accurate in classifying this disorder.
Binary logistic regression analysis was carried out to ascertain predictors of low resilience, with significance levels set at p ≤ 0.05 or near significance (0.1 > p > 0.05).
showed a trendp > 0.05
Low-frequency dominant fatigue before the training showed a trend toward high-frequency dominant fatigue after the training ( p > 0.05).
When significant and marginally significant ( i.e. , p < 0.05 and p ≤ 0.10) variables from the univariate analyses were included in the multivariate analysis, both age and reason for migration remained statistically significant with p < 0.05. 3.2.
In addition, political ideology was found to moderate the effect of the moral frame on credibility at a marginally significant level, B = 35, p = 0.05.
Conversely, the increase in the surfactant concentration did not promote a significant trend to the zeta potential of the SLNs ( p < 0.05), which presented negative surface charge with values of −15 to −10 mV.
A statistical trend was declared when one indicator was significant and the other one was not (e.g., p > 0.05 and Cohen’s d ≥ 0.2).
p < 0.01 was regarded as extremely significant, while p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Values where p <0.001 were considered highly significant while values where p <0.05 were considered significant on the average.
no significant difference between first responders that participated in special operations or non-special operations regarding the importance of health monitoring preferences; (6) there was a significant association between age group of the respondent and cortisol levels (stress) ( p = 0.02) and a borderline significant association between age group of the respondent and skin resistance ( p = 0.05); (7) there was a significant association between special operations and biological proteins ( p = 0.03); and (8) there was a significant association between age group of the respondent and carbon dioxide ( p = 0.03).