Excerpts

AISI showed a borderline significant negative association with DMFT ( β = −0.001, 95% CI −0.001 to 0.010, p = 0.0496), while SIRI, SII, NEU, IIC, and NLR showed similar negative trends with p -values between 0.05 and 0.10.

Similar results were obtained in the CIMA-CUN cohort ( n = 95 cases); however, in this case, a tendency toward significance ( p = 0.12) for RFS and a marginally significant difference ( p = 0.0499) for OS were observed ( Figure S1A,B, Supplementary Materials ).

10.3%), but it did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.05).

Analysis of our data did not reveal a statistically significant association between physical or mental multimorbidity and rates of irreversible organ damage (SDI ≥ 1), although the total number of physical comorbidities showed a trend for correlation with the SDI (Spearman’s rho = 0.126, p = 0.050).

While the EBL, preoperative Hb level, and changes between pre- and postoperative Hb levels were nominally significant ( p < 0.05), their P values were higher than the adjusted P values (0.003); therefore, the results were not significant.

From the meta-analysis, the difference between patients and controls was highly significant at Workload@VT (overall mean: −10.8 at Test 1 vs. −33.0 at Test 2, p < 0.05), which may reflect present the functional impairment associated with PEM.

Additionally, Ki-67 and N-cadherin showed borderline significance ( p ≈ 0.05–0.07), suggesting potential differential expression.

38), pre-SLS test-dominant (26.8% decrease in falls for 1 unit increase in pre-SLS test-dominant, p = 0.003), pre-SLS test-non-dominant (15.9% decrease in falls with 1 unit increase in pre-SLS test-non-dominant, p = 0.029), MMSE (10.9% decrease in falls with 1 unit increase in MMSE, p = 0.018), and marginally significant for pre-FRT (4.6% decrease in falls with 1 unit increase in pre-FRT, p = 0.050).

When only adipokines are included in the model, solely the association between adiponectin levels and risk of RA was close to significance (OR: 1.05, per 1000 ng/mL; 95% CI: 1.00–1.10, p = 0.05; Table 3 (A Model 1)).

Moreover, in the multivariate analysis, the time to intervention reached only borderline significance with an OR of 0.97 (95% CI 0.95–0.99) and p = 0.05.

IVF Success Rates Despite a marginal trend towards significance ( p = 0.05), the implantation rate (17.3% vs. 23.6%) and the live birth rate per cycle (16.1% vs. 23.2%) were comparable between the endometriosis and the control groups.

There was no significant difference between BCC and SCC, besides the stinging sensations, which were most frequent in SCC but only of borderline significance ( p = 0.05).

The level of the CD56 br CD16 − NK cell subset was lower, which almost reached statistical significance ( p = 0.050), as shown in Table 3 .

We performed a test for excess significance to evaluate whether the number of studies reporting nominally significant results ( p -value < 0.05) is greater compared to their expected number [ 24 , 25 ].

The difference between CeD patients and controls was highly significant ( p < 0.05).

4.0 m/s, p = 0.019), and in valvuloarterial impedance ( p = 0.032); the SWL decreased by an amount that was nearly significant ( p = 0.050), whereas there was no effect on aortic regurgitation ( Figure 1 , individual data in Supplemental Tables S3 and S4 ).

The PPS patients with right leg sequelae also showed a nearly significant rating of ipsilateral QL ( p = 0.05) in favor of inverse correlation, and a similar yet non-significant inverse correlation was also found in the left leg sequelae. 4.

However, antiplatelet use and combined antithrombotic use, show an increasing trend worth further monitoring ( χ 2 ; p = 0.05 and p = 0.09 respectively). 3.5.

A near-significant difference in time since the cardiovascular event (39.41 vs. 34.94 days, p = 0.05) was observed between DM and non-DM patients ( Table 1 ).

Additionally, women had a better OS than men, with borderline significance ( p = 0.05).

The presence of headaches was borderline significant with an OR of 0.04 (95% CI: 0.0006, 0.60; p = 0.05). 4.

In these adjusted analyses, the higher prevalence of malignancy in cLP-only patients remained significant compared with oLP-only patients (adjusted OR 2.70, 95% CI 1.45–5.04; p = 0.002) and LPP-only patients (adjusted OR 1.88, 95% CI 1.07–3.31; p = 0.028), with borderline significance compared with gLP-only patients (adjusted OR 2.71, 95% CI 1.00–7.35; p = 0.050).

In patients with BAM, performance of usual activities improved, while improvement in overall assessment of bowel function and stool consistency were only of borderline significance ( p = 0.05).

Survival Pre-HSCT weight, BMI, fat mass, RAPA-Aerobic activity score, Positive Affect, GCGQ score, and ASAS-Wellness all correlated with longer survival; however, these were nominally significant ( p < 0.05) and did not reach significance at our pre-determined level ( p < 0.01).

Within macula-on patients, there was a borderline significant increase over time (0.011 [0.00005; 0.022], p = 0.050).