Fisher’s exact test based on the concatenated Cytb and CR datasets obtained a highly significant ( P <0.001) relationship between genetic variation sites and lineage.
Excerpts
In a mixed effect model including time step 1 and time step 4 in one model (see statistical analyses), the interaction term between insecticide treatment×time step was highly significant ( F 1,13 = 20.98, P <0.001), providing evidence that the effect of insecticide treatment was not constant across the sampling dates, with lower aphid abundances in the treated fields at the first survey (first time step), but higher aphid abundances in the treated fields at the last survey.
showed a trendP <0.001
Interestingly, the nonsurvivors receiving appropriate empirical antibiotics showed a trend of no or less increase in Oxa-51 DNA compared with those receiving inappropriate empirical antibiotics ( P <0.001, Mann-Whitney U test, two tailed) (left panels, Figures 3B and 3C ).
The relationship between ECO 2 levels and the immediate preceding end-inflation lung gas volume was highly significant (p<0.001; Fig. 5 ).
All pairwise comparisons among morphotypes from different localities resulted in a highly significant ( P < 0.001) genetic differentiation, with F ST values ranging from 0.971 (Cíes SU vs Arealonga RB) to 0.191 (Cíes SU vs Ons SU).
The differences were highly significant ( F = 67.81; df = 2,8; P <0.001).
The difference in survival is statistically highly significant (p<0.001) and mortality remains elevated in the tumour-group after five (46.1%, CI: 37.4–54.8% versus 19.0%, CI 11.9–26.2%) and ten years (63.1%, CI: 52.8–73.4% versus 46.6%, CI: 34.1–59.1%) ( Fig 4 ).
Results Our instructions successfully elicited three desired reading aloud tempi: the full model for the total reading time was clearly significant compared to the null model (likelihood ratio test: χ 2 = 169.43, df = 3, p < 0.001, effect size for the full model: R 2 m = 0.72, R 2 c = 0.82).
At Geeveston, the mean DBH of the long-distance crosses was only marginally (at the 5% significance level) greater than the mid-parent value by age 13 years, but at Weilangta highly significant ( P ≤0.001) heterosis was evident by age 9 years ( Table 1 ).
This difference is highly significant (χ 2 test, df = 1, P<0.001).
In addition, feeding activity increased only slightly with resource abundances (p < 0.05) but highly significant with an increase in the diversity of insect families (p < 0.001, Table 3 ).
It is peculiar why the AOR for female compared to male was less than 1 (AOR=0.569) and highly significant (p <.001). c.
The intercept, representing the baseline use of novel forms for the reference category ‘Greece’, was estimated at -4.774 with a highly significant p-value (p <.001).
This difference in LTI was confirmed in the ANCOVA, where a highly significant group effect (F 2,29 = 10.3, p<0.001) was detected; this factor alone accounting for >40% of the total variance.
When results from three capsule isolations were analyzed and compared to that of the three EtOHp preparations from which the purified HMW O-Ag capsule was derived, the compositional FA differences were again observed, including: increased presence in capsule of 3-OH-16:0 ( Fig 3G , left; p<0.05) and C14:0 ( Fig 3G , center, did not reach statistical significance) and decreased presence of C16:0 ( Fig 3G , right; p<0.001).
For the genus data set, when comparing each pair of samples, clustering was highly significant (raw p<0.001 and after the Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons, p<0.002).
Likewise, the three-way interaction (GxLxY) resulted in a highly significant variation at P < 0 . 001 for SEV, RES and CI.
Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin sampling adequacy measure was 0.80 and Bartlett’s sphericity test was highly significant ( P<0 . 001 ).
The results were considered significant when p (degree of significance) is less than 0.05, very significant when p < 0.01 and highly significant when p < 0.001.
Pairwise comparisons ( Table 5 ) showed highly significant (p<0.001) differences between elasmobranchs and teleosts and crustaceans.
Results We found that the condition in which the dogs were tested had a highly significant effect on how long the dogs manipulated the apparatus (LMM, N = 20, F 2,36 = 12.478, P≤0.001, Figure 3 ).
These experiments reveal that increasing ACC concentrations result in a highly significant (p<0.001) decrease of GFP extinction by up to 41% ( Figure 3D ), which reflects anti-proliferative properties of ACC.
In the analysis of plant height and leaf rosette diameter, most of the data sets did not pass the normality test and therefore Mann-Whitney U test was used to statistically evaluate the data and to confirm highly significant (p<0.001) difference between each of the two synthetic quintuple mutants and respective controls.
Results Images in windowless and windowed clinics exhibited highly significant differences (p < 0.001) with spectrophotometer (control).
Both results were statistically highly significant (p<0.001) by Fisher's exact test.