Barely Significant

Excerpts

33,758 sentences · 1 filter applied

nearly significantp = 0.061.2× alphagold
In the second session, we observed a nearly significant relation between Stimulus Intensity, Attention Condition and Individual Training Time for the post-post2 group, F (1,11) = 4.4, p = 0.06, η p 2 = 0.28, but we found no relation between Individual Training Time and Stimulus Intensity when separate tests were performed per attention condition ( p > 0.35).
nearly significantp = 0.061.2× alphagold
Effects of age and treatments on fasting plasma insulin, HOMA-IR and RMR A nearly significant effect of treatment on fasting insulin was revealed (dF = 2/26, F = 3.141, p = 0.06), while no significant effect of age was found (dF = 1/26, F = 1.722, p = 0.201), nor was a crossed effect found (dF = 2/26, F = 1.856, p = 0.176) ( Table 1 ).
borderline significancep = 0.061.2× alpha
[38] published a review paper examining the relationship of Brassica vegetable consumption and prostate cancer risk and found that three of the six well-designed studies reported significant reduced risks (p<0.05) and one reported a borderline significance for reduced risk (p = 0.06) with high Brassica vegetable consumption.
borderline significancep = 0.061.2× alpha
Women in Poland and Greece appeared less likely, while women in Ireland were more likely, to meet the WHO PA recommendations (borderline significance: p = 0.06 and p = 0.1, respectively; Fig 2 and S2 Table ). 30 min · d −1 PA recommendation When PA guidelines were defined as at least 3 0 min · d −1 of MVPA [ 5 ], prevalence estimates of meeting these guidelines were lower and ranged from 27.1% (Greece) to 46% (UK) for men and from 10.4% (Greece) to 25.6% (Ireland) for women.
showed a trendp = 0.061.2× alpha
In the test cohort, plasma EGF and MIP-1β/CCL4 statistically differed in both classification groups (p<0.0001 and p = 0.0002, respectively); in the validation cohort, both analytes showed a trend (p = 0.06) to be at lower concentrations in the plasma of progressive patients (SP-MS and PP-MS) than in RR-MS patients ( Table 3 ).
a strong trendp=0.061.2× alphagold
The ANOVA displayed a main effect of group [F(2, 26)=3.61; p=0.04] on shelter seeking behaviour, which according to the post-hoc test was due to the young MS360 rats displaying less shelter seeking behaviour compared to the young AFR rats (p=0.02) and there was a strong trend towards a similar difference in the adult rats (p=0.06), Figure 3e .