Barely Significant

Excerpts

33,758 sentences · 1 filter applied

In logistic regression analysis, years in the profession were close to being statistically significant, where more than ten years in the profession indicated an increased probability of disagreeing with the statement (cOR 1.42; CI 0.98–2.07; n = 690; p = 0.064).
a trend towards significancep = 0.0641.3× alpha
However, the similarly expected correlation between Cho/NAA in the right CST and left finger tap rate has a trend towards significance (p = 0.064), possibly due to a slightly less number of patients with left upper limb weakness included in this study (10 patients with left upper limb weakness versus 13 patients with right upper limb weakness).
marginal significancep = 0.0641.3× alphagold
n [HR: 1.999, 95% CI: 1.622–2.646, p < 0.001], poor performance status [HR: 1.463, 95% CI: 1.221–1.751, p < 0.001], and ALBI grade 2 [HR: 1.531, 95% CI: 1.285–2.823, p < 0.001] were independent predictors associated with a decreased survival; ALBI grade 3 was associated with a decreased survival at marginal significance [HR: 1.525, 95% CI: 0.967–2.38, p = 0.064] in the Cox model.
Interestingly, model 6 at T8 (not shown) excluded TME-Back and replaced it with TME-Abdominals and BMI, but these two variables just failed to reach statistical significance (P = 0.064 and 0.065, respectively).
approached significanceP = 0.0641.3× alpha
A paired samples t-test showed that the difference in the median values of all fluorescence and scatter profiles at the removal of nitrogen and again at the end of gametogenesis, was significant only for the channel FL1 (t 1 = 16.0 P = 0.040) and approached significance for side-scatter (t 1 = 9.9 P = 0.064) in this small late logarithmic dataset.
marginally significantp = 0.0641.3× alphagold
Comparing the two pulse-timings showed a marginally significant main effect of pulse timing ( F (1,7) = 4.820; p = 0.064) indicating that applying TMS pulses early, directly at the offset of the stimulus display, resulted in larger recall errors (24.23° on average) than TMS applied midway through the retention interval (23.4° on average) Audible ‘clicks’ from a TMS machine can have differential attentional cuing effects when presented at different time points [ 44 ], and thus have the potential to influence behavior differently early versus late during a memory delay.